Re: Web-hacks, Imperialism, and the best made plans of mice and men.

nate (schmolze who-is-at students.wisc.edu)
Wed, 9 Dec 1998 19:30:37 -0600

In reading some of the past messages I question if at times our
pessimism with technology may in some ways be the best promoter
of its imperialism. T.V. is an example that comes to mind in
that we are flooded with messages about its danger, but do not
embrace it in the sense of becoming critical consumers of the
medium. Our response to T.V. is often having children or others
watch less T.V. in that the T.V. itself is the enemy. My
concern with such an approach is that we negate the object while
leaving its power over us intact. How often do we as educators
watch commercials, tv shows pointing out its control on us as
consumers. For me, in reference to being critical this is the
difference between reacting rather than responding.

In reference to the internet with all the dangers of
corporations I think it also offers a diversity of views which
can not be found any where else. I was recently listening to
someone involved with curriculum development in schools critique
the internet because the knowledge got in the way or
contradicted the content she wanted taught in schools. I think
the internet is a not only a tool of the power structure, but
also a threat. I am reminded of Diane's sig in that any tool
can be a weapon if you hold it right. I guess I see internet
itself as being the best tool to combat its destructive use. I
think of all the insights I have had because of the opportunity
to recieve such a diversity of experiences and writings which
would be difficult to attain in a university library or
classroom. Specifically, in my part of the world perspectives
such as Phil's on globilization are just not common place.

Nate