Re: non-fixed objects (Re: Unidentified subject)

Judy Diamondstone (diamonju who-is-at rci.rutgers.edu)
20 May 1998 23:37:55 -0000

What do you think?

At 10:15 PM 5/20/98 +0200, you wrote:
>At 01.15 +0900 98-05-21, Naoki Ueno wrote:
>>According to my understanding, in activity theory,
>>subject, object, and tool are not the fixted lavels or categories for
>>something that has some specific attributes.
>>Depending on situation, depending on perspective or a way of
>>participation, what is subject, object, or tool is different and
>>changing, and reorganizing.
>>
>>Further, the meaning of motive in AT is quite different from motivation,
>>intention and something like in traditional psychology.
>
>These are my understandings, too -- although as understandings they are in
>all likelihood of a much more recent date than Naoki Ueno's.
>
>Eva
>eva.ekeblad who-is-at ped.gu.se
>
>
>
>

Judith Diamondstone (732) 932-7496 Ext. 352
Graduate School of Education
Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
10 Seminary Place
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1183