Re: re-designs & anarchy

Eva Ekeblad (eva.ekeblad who-is-at ped.gu.se)
Wed, 29 Oct 1997 21:05:11 +0100

At 08.46 -0800 97-10-29, diane celia hodges wrote:
>>And what to do with THEM, the *owners* of the existing structures?
>
>1) no site of education or learning or care or social service
>ought to be owned privately. So, first,
>we abolish the rights to privately own public property.

ooooh, Diane, you make me feel old

reminds me of the days back in 72 when the guys around our kitchen table
were discussing the impending revolution -- me quietly believing them,
scared to paralysis, but bravely planning how to survive with Baby in the
woods...

YES I was VERY naive. Co-authoring my own submission: nothing is innocent,
as Patti Lather gleefully lectured us.

And besides, what of the cases when WE are THEM?
State or municipal property isn't necessarily less rotten than privately own=
ed.

Eva