Re: learning from lectures Re: Stone article

Robin Harwood (HARWOOD who-is-at UConnVM.UConn.Edu)
Wed, 01 May 96 18:33:40 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: ENANGEL who-is-at cityu.edu.hk: "Re: language as a cognitive parser"
Previous message: Robin Harwood: "Re: Bruner's list"

>a discussion between people holding differing views. I agree that it is
>not possible to say that nothing ever happens to people's ideas as a result
>of lecture. It's just that so little happens for so few in a positive way
>about the actual content of the lecture and so much happens for so many,

I feel a knot in the warp and woof of our conversational thread.
On the one hand, there is the idea that people learn best when they
learn interactively. On the other hand, there is the idea that we cannot
look for external evidence of internal engagement. What, then, do we
mean by "interactive"?

Robin

Next message: ENANGEL who-is-at cityu.edu.hk: "Re: language as a cognitive parser"
Previous message: Robin Harwood: "Re: Bruner's list"