[Xmca-l] Re: [External] xmca is lively and good

[Robert Lake]

You are absolutely correct Anthony!
 Your intergenerational dialogues and interviews have truly been refreshing
and richly informative.
Thank-you!
*Robert Lake*


On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 6:50 PM Anthony Barra <anthonymbarra@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Some recent conversation at the Cultural Praxis site has speculated that
> xmca-based discourse is waning (e.g., https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bit.ly/369A8d6__;!!Mih3wA!Ww5lc7zYPxctEl08fSI4STw4mssOkt3n1dYKR_Zk9Q2TC9GcwABQ6090bvHB2pzTDnM8tQ$ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bit.ly/369A8d6__;!!Mih3wA!SccwXMds5fqIIEhwR3l8JTMhNvb5Mwx70_isLi1atVDVZ0r88FJDKnQBJ8MQu57_fMfowA$>).
> But I don't think that is true -- not that I have much insight, history, or
> standing to observe confidently.
>
> But the xmca list is rather epic -- bigger by far than any single
> participant and actually a marvel in various ways.  Simply peek through the
> archives, as I often do, to find proof positive.
>
> This is 100% correct, is it not?
>
> Anthony
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20201106/50e1ed05/attachment.html