[Xmca-l] Re: "sociocultural psychology" ?
Andy Blunden
andyb@marxists.org
Fri May 15 18:49:33 PDT 2020
Annalisa, I have only been talking and writing about
Vygotsky and co. since about 2000 and have been openly
Marxist since the 1960s (indeed, Vygotsky is core to how I
understand Marx) and never had any reason not to be. But it
is true that when Mike first went to Moscow, it was at the
height of the Cold War, and when he and others first brought
Vygotsky's ideas to the USA, there was a lot of resistance
to their Marxist content. I think the naming issue only
arose as Vygotsky and the others began to build a real
following. The issues with the choice of name change over
the years, as you say. I prefer" CHAT," but sometimes I use
"Cultural Psychology" and sometimes I use "Activity Theory"
depending on the context.
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
Hegel for Social Movements <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://brill.com/view/title/54574__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm26SqOHBwA$ >
Home Page <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm26T9d8i0w$ >
On 16/05/2020 4:18 am, Annalisa Aguilar wrote:
> Andy, et al,
>
> I sort of came to this a little late in the thread, but I
> can offer that Vera John-Steiner didn't mind
> "sociocultural" to describe Vygotskian theory, but as I
> learn more about the word (thank you Mike), I can see how
> once a word is utilized with intent of derision, it's hard
> for the association to be broken.
>
> I think it's that way with words all the time coming and
> going out of favor, or meanings shifting, like the game of
> telephone, but across generations and cultures.
>
> Might I contribute to the discussion by asking whether the
> use of "sociocultural" was also a means of making the
> theories more available in the West (at least in the US).
> It seems there was redscare (you are welcome read the
> double entendre: "red scare" or "reds care", as you like)
> prevalent, and wouldn't it be useful to remove the Marxist
> "brand" to access the actual theories on child
> development? In other words, to depoliticize the science?
>
> I had been a proponent of the use of the word, but as time
> passes, I can see its problems.
>
> For me, I had preferred the word because historical was
> always a given for me. In concern of the here and now, the
> real difficulty I had thought was understanding the
> social- how interactions between the child and the
> caretaker/teacher/knowledgeable peer and the -cultural,
> how the culture impacts thought, those things are more of
> the micro level, but also sociocultural, how the two also
> can interact and influence one another and that combined
> bears its own signature on the mind and its development.
> As far as History (capital H) that is sort of difficult to
> measure when we are talking about child development as
> there is very little history that a child has, unless we
> are talking about genetics, I suppose.
>
> Now? I'm fairly agnostic about the term. I respect and am
> enriched by the discourse in which we now we find
> ourselves immersed about it so thanks to all for this.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Annalisa
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu
> <xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu> on behalf of Andy
> Blunden <andyb@marxists.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 14, 2020 7:24 PM
> *To:* xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> *Subject:* [Xmca-l] Re: "sociocultural psychology" ?
>
> * [EXTERNAL]*
>
> **
>
> In response to requests, I will elaborate. Apologies to
> Mike if I have garbled the long and complex story he told.
> I have done my best.
>
> Jim Wertsch said:
>
> Various people undoubtedly have various accounts of
> this, but I consciously started to use this in order
> to bring in cultural anthropology and also to avoid
> the unexamined social evolutionism in some approaches
> that I was building from. I believe I started
> highlighting it in my 1985 book on Vygotsky, and by
> 1991 it was part of the subtitle of my book Voices of
> the Mind. It is not a term used by Soviet scholars
> when talking about the Vygotsky tradition. Instead,
> the terms there were “socio-historical” or
> “cultural-historical.”
>
> Mike Cole told me:
>
> In addition to what has been said on line ...
> initially, the term "sociocultural" was used as a term
> of abuse by the opponents of Vygotsky's ideas in the
> Soviet bureaucracy, so it was not a term which his
> Russian followers ever embraced. The Soviet hostility
> to Vygotsky came to a head, apparently, in 1986 when
> ISCRAT had a conference in Berlin and the Soviets
> prevented Russian delegates form attending. Jim
> Wertsch, who had been on a sabbatical year, and had
> been in the Soviet Union, and was angry about what he
> saw, was at the congress too and went from there to a
> conference in Spain where a group of Spanish
> Vygotskyists were arguing that Vygotskyists had
> ignored the needs, etc., of the "global South" and
> they used the term "sociocultural" for their approach,
> meaning something like Vygotsky+postcolonialism.
> Wertsch embraced this idea and henceforth adopted to
> term, meaning to distinguish himself from the
> Soviet-influence. CHAT emerged as a term a little
> later in an effort to unite the followers of the
> various brands of "Activity Theory" with those who did
> not embrace the Activity Theory of Vygotsky's Russian
> followers and stuck with Vygotsky. CHAT includes the H
> for History, because in all the various terms being
> used at that time, there was no attention to the
> important place of History in theory, and it was Mike
> who insisted on its inclusion.
>
> Andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> *Andy Blunden*
> Hegel for Social Movements
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://brill.com/view/title/54574__;!!Mih3wA!RTGbCZZ1yCkr4jCqSe4SB3e7KrPD-Ptq8Hhz2_7jDT2OtWnRBco2e9D6yKW2qUv1JKsaYg$>
> Home Page
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm__;!!Mih3wA!RTGbCZZ1yCkr4jCqSe4SB3e7KrPD-Ptq8Hhz2_7jDT2OtWnRBco2e9D6yKW2qUuwMTbXLQ$>
>
> On 14/05/2020 11:55 am, Andy Blunden wrote:
>>
>> I should have reported progress with my question.
>>
>> Jim Wertsch responded to me on email and Mike Cole Skyped
>> me and between these two I have a very rich history of
>> the usage of this term and the various nuances it
>> acquired and shed, and Mike has put the article Martin
>> referred to on his academia.edu page for us all to read.
>>
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.academia.edu/43037735/Sociocul_tural_studies_of_rnind_Edited_by__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm25bNWltug$
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.academia.edu/43037735/Sociocul_tural_studies_of_rnind_Edited_by__;!!Mih3wA!R2PQRv7SmtSpShBHHVPDEjIG1-ol_VEYh22ETbbkrOTaZbmV95HyZtHr1MBppGr6Y2oI9g$>
>>
>> As ever, XMCA has proved to be a bottomless mine of
>> wisdom. Thank you.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> *Andy Blunden*
>> Hegel for Social Movements
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://brill.com/view/title/54574__;!!Mih3wA!R2PQRv7SmtSpShBHHVPDEjIG1-ol_VEYh22ETbbkrOTaZbmV95HyZtHr1MBppGqUcVpkyg$>
>> Home Page
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm__;!!Mih3wA!R2PQRv7SmtSpShBHHVPDEjIG1-ol_VEYh22ETbbkrOTaZbmV95HyZtHr1MBppGoS67wBRQ$>
>>
>> On 14/05/2020 1:38 am, Charles Bazerman wrote:
>>> Thank you Anthony for the interesting question and link.
>>> The way I see this issue is that Vygotskian work
>>> attempts to understand human activity
>>> multi-dimensionally (or even better holistically, trying
>>> to reunite what the emergence of various parochial
>>> disciplines have pulled apart for analysis of the
>>> separate dimensions). The different terms that Veresov
>>> points out as contending are simply foregrounding those
>>> sets of components that are most salient to the
>>> particular analyst at that moment. To those we might
>>> add other elements that Vygotsky was interested in such
>>> as consciousness and language and experience and
>>> mediation (and even economics and human knowledge and
>>> education lurk in the background, as well as human
>>> neurodiversity as well as materialities of the
>>> experienced world). That is the wonder of Vygotsky,
>>> even though he may have developed some of the components
>>> more than others and he was acting nominally as a
>>> psychologist--yet his approach allows the integration of
>>> all these components.
>>>
>>> I therefore use different conjunctions of terms
>>> depending on what I am talking about, and I see activity
>>> as the overarching term--though this does not
>>> necessarily mean triangles all the time. Rather
>>> activity is humans in motion, mobilizing multiple
>>> internal and external resources in situations.
>>>
>>> While I would like some stability in terms, right now
>>> our different concerns and issues leave salience
>>> mutable. And I am not yet comfortable in being
>>> terminally enlisted into another scholar's transient
>>> saliencies.
>>>
>>> BTW, I see another related, parallel attempt at
>>> reintegrating the social sciences in the pragmatist
>>> project which has at times been in communication with
>>> the activity theory project (see my paper "Practically
>>> Human"). This project also never settled on a coherent
>>> set of terms and stable concepts.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>> ----
>>> די פאַרייניקטע שטאַטן איז אַ פאָלק פון ימאַגראַנץ
>>> الولايات المتحدة هي أمة من المهاجرين
>>> Los Estados Unidos es una nación de inmigrantes.
>>> The U.S. is a nation of immigrants.
>>> History will judge.
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bazerman.education.ucsb.edu/__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm24wdquw4w$
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bazerman.education.ucsb.edu/__;!!Mih3wA!UhKa4f0rCaFbK573eepABBebep9QDP87JqQVUnd9uIfxETz6hRUnOR46PYaTgoSDGY6tLw$>
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Charles_Bazerman__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm26d06BNTw$
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Charles_Bazerman__;!!Mih3wA!UhKa4f0rCaFbK573eepABBebep9QDP87JqQVUnd9uIfxETz6hRUnOR46PYaTgoSePA_SrQ$>
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.isawr.org__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm27spT_dhQ$
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.isawr.org__;!!Mih3wA!UhKa4f0rCaFbK573eepABBebep9QDP87JqQVUnd9uIfxETz6hRUnOR46PYaTgoRwwTwk4Q$>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 8:08 AM Anthony Barra
>>> <anthonymbarra@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:anthonymbarra@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Interesting question (and follow-ups) here. Thanks,
>>> Andy.
>>>
>>> While not 100% related, I wonder if this brief,
>>> 2-minute excerpt adds any value:
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT4uktowa-M__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm24AVOsEow$
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT4uktowa-M__;!!Mih3wA!WLyceskZQL4AGQL-pVuwd-RH-yfvzQvsIVerMU367Nw8BZjwVLHdZ94SZfyfIX_sfjyW7w$> "Pros
>>> and Cons of (terminological) Diversity"
>>>
>>> As a non-expert, I can empathize with Nikolai's main
>>> point, but I'm not so sure the cons outweigh the
>>> pros here.
>>>
>>> But what WOULD happen if a terminological consensus
>>> was formed -- could Vygotsky's theory (and
>>> methodology), in fact, be definitively defined? If
>>> so, would the benefits of doing so outweigh the
>>> constraints?
>>> I'm guessing this is an old conversation, and maybe
>>> even stale, but I'm more outsider than insider and
>>> don't really know.
>>>
>>> Thank you for any insight.
>>>
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:19 AM Martin Packer
>>> <mpacker@cantab.net <mailto:mpacker@cantab.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I had assumed you were looking for uses earlier
>>> than Jim Wertsch’s, Andy.
>>>
>>> Jim used the term in titles in 1989 too. And in
>>> the introduction to this book he, along with
>>> Pablo del Rio and Amelia Alvarez, explain why in
>>> their view it’s the best term:
>>>
>>> Wertsch, J. V., del Río, P., & Alvarez, A.
>>> (Eds.). (1995). /Sociocultural studies of mind./
>>> Cambridge University Press.
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On May 12, 2020, at 11:13 PM, Andy Blunden
>>>> <andyb@marxists.org
>>>> <mailto:andyb@marxists.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone for their help. It all went
>>>> into the mix. Indeed, the term seems to have
>>>> migrated from Spanish to English and the word
>>>> "sociocultural" became popular in 1990, and it
>>>> seems that Jim Wertsch is the fellow who
>>>> triggered the explosion in "sociocultural
>>>> psychology" with "Voices of the mind : a
>>>> sociocultural approach to mediated action
>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.worldcat.org/title/voices-of-the-mind-a-sociocultural-approach-to-mediated-action/oclc/797855062&referer=brief_results__;!!Mih3wA!WsWX2sD5ZfUnBEp3uLEVG7T0NliMnbPpuJl6VOoxtiFfKP5msJWjbZPFaCQ6jDWDMZtFSg$>"
>>>> published by Harvard University Press in 1991.
>>>>
>>>> Although "sociocultural" seems to be most
>>>> widely associated with "context dependence,"
>>>> Wertsch's reference to "mediated action" in the
>>>> title of this book makes it clear that for him
>>>> "context" referred to the signs and artefacts
>>>> mediating action.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again to all
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *Andy Blunden*
>>>> Hegel for Social Movements
>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://brill.com/view/title/54574__;!!Mih3wA!WsWX2sD5ZfUnBEp3uLEVG7T0NliMnbPpuJl6VOoxtiFfKP5msJWjbZPFaCQ6jDWcr53a1g$>
>>>> Home Page
>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm__;!!Mih3wA!WsWX2sD5ZfUnBEp3uLEVG7T0NliMnbPpuJl6VOoxtiFfKP5msJWjbZPFaCQ6jDW3ivveVA$>
>>>>
>>>> On 13/05/2020 12:26 pm, David Kellogg wrote:
>>>>> Andy--
>>>>>
>>>>> Go to to the Google N-gram site itself.
>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://books.google.com/ngrams__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm25cw4rS7Q$
>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://books.google.com/ngrams__;!!Mih3wA!Wt7qmS7sdvLo3anWG71NQFUJMvyFBqEy-mStjfAI_HEUpY8D8dQt5zHkl12Ld90MDkv2Mw$>
>>>>> Then do your own n-gram for "sociocultural
>>>>> psychology". If you set the years you'll get
>>>>> better granularity in the document search.
>>>>> On the bottom of the n-gram, there are some
>>>>> dates in blue--when you click on them, you
>>>>> should get a list of all the books used in the
>>>>> search.
>>>>>
>>>>> dk
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> David Kellogg
>>>>> Sangmyung University
>>>>>
>>>>> New Article: Ruqaiya Hasan, in memoriam: A
>>>>> manual and a manifesto.
>>>>> Outlines, Spring 2020
>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/116238/167607__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm267mAeuCA$
>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/116238/167607__;!!Mih3wA!Wt7qmS7sdvLo3anWG71NQFUJMvyFBqEy-mStjfAI_HEUpY8D8dQt5zHkl12Ld92Vl0flPg$>
>>>>>
>>>>> New Translation with Nikolai Veresov: /L.S.
>>>>> Vygotsky's Pedological Works/ /Volume One:
>>>>> Foundations of Pedology/"
>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811505270__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm26lqpufAg$
>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811505270__;!!Mih3wA!Wt7qmS7sdvLo3anWG71NQFUJMvyFBqEy-mStjfAI_HEUpY8D8dQt5zHkl12Ld92EeQenpA$>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:17 AM Martin Packer
>>>>> <mpacker@cantab.net
>>>>> <mailto:mpacker@cantab.net>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The earliest use of the term
>>>>> ‘sociocultural’ I’ve been able to find in
>>>>> English is this:
>>>>>
>>>>> A sociocultural psychology, by Rogelio
>>>>> Diaz-Guerrero
>>>>>
>>>>> In "Chicano psychology", 1977 - Academic Press
>>>>>
>>>>> Diaz-Guerrero was Mexican psychologists
>>>>> whose publications in Spanish use the term
>>>>> ‘sociocultural’ frequently.
>>>>>
>>>>> The 2nd edition of Chicano Psychology is
>>>>> available in Google books,
>>>>> and Diaz-Guerrero has a chapter in it, but
>>>>> titled The psychological study of the Mexican.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 12, 2020, at 8:47 PM, Andy Blunden
>>>>>> <andyb@marxists.org
>>>>>> <mailto:andyb@marxists.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That graph from Google shows that usage
>>>>>> of the term took off in 1988. How do we
>>>>>> find out who wrote what in 1988?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And Google also tell us that
>>>>>> "Socioculturaltheory grew from the work
>>>>>> of seminalpsychologistLev Vygotsky, who
>>>>>> believed that parents, caregivers, peers,
>>>>>> and the culture at large were responsible
>>>>>> for developing higher-order functions.
>>>>>> According to Vygotsky, learning has its
>>>>>> basis in interacting with other people,"
>>>>>> together with a reference. So that is nice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> *Andy Blunden*
>>>>>> Hegel for Social Movements
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://brill.com/view/title/54574__;!!Mih3wA!XAtiPQXEOK3tz8RHCURqNz0psvv8Js3PxWmYUmHtZyY5j_IK-RqcFDVph7-NJ5i1rCBdtQ$>
>>>>>> Home Page
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm__;!!Mih3wA!XAtiPQXEOK3tz8RHCURqNz0psvv8Js3PxWmYUmHtZyY5j_IK-RqcFDVph7-NJ5gDytDZfw$>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13/05/2020 11:30 am, David Kellogg wrote:
>>>>>>> Andy:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did a Google N-gram on it. You
>>>>>>> probably thought of doing this too, but
>>>>>>> here's what I got.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://books.google.com/ngrams/interactive_chart?content=sociocultural*psychology&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1*3B*2Csociocultural*20psychology*3B*2Cc0__;KyUlJSUl!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm25Hv5Q5AQ$
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://books.google.com/ngrams/interactive_chart?content=sociocultural*psychology&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1*3B*2Csociocultural*20psychology*3B*2Cc0__;KyUlJSUl!!Mih3wA!T9TXqTQDd-8tvv5PfuxbPkx6Drdw0VlIrRNfcypZApQv2jnziHRkeAppccOVAZEmjetMCg$>"
>>>>>>> width=900 height=500 marginwidth=0
>>>>>>> marginheight=0 hspace=0 vspace=0
>>>>>>> frameborder=0 scrolling=no
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So it all starts around 1960. At first I
>>>>>>> thought this probably referred to the
>>>>>>> Hanfmann and Vakar "Thought and
>>>>>>> Language", but when I looked the only
>>>>>>> books that used the term were sports
>>>>>>> psychology books. The big uptick after
>>>>>>> 1992 is Vygotsky though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course, this is all English only. I
>>>>>>> am sure you will find very different
>>>>>>> results in German, where "cultural
>>>>>>> historical psychology" is the trend
>>>>>>> identified with Dilthey, Spranger, and
>>>>>>> neo-Kantianism generally.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Kellogg
>>>>>>> Sangmyung University
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> New Article: Ruqaiya Hasan, in memoriam:
>>>>>>> A manual and a manifesto.
>>>>>>> Outlines, Spring 2020
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/116238/167607__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm267mAeuCA$
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/116238/167607__;!!Mih3wA!T9TXqTQDd-8tvv5PfuxbPkx6Drdw0VlIrRNfcypZApQv2jnziHRkeAppccOVAZFjmWjmLg$>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> New Translation with Nikolai Veresov:
>>>>>>> /L.S. Vygotsky's Pedological Works/
>>>>>>> /Volume One: Foundations of Pedology/"
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811505270__;!!Mih3wA!TlyHZFzEZ7SUE8GqN8__jv7a2SAk9Q_jiqAbrNCH5Bf1I-_gLIHGg1AbVtGJm26lqpufAg$
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811505270__;!!Mih3wA!T9TXqTQDd-8tvv5PfuxbPkx6Drdw0VlIrRNfcypZApQv2jnziHRkeAppccOVAZGMmypSYw$>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:43 PM Andy
>>>>>>> Blunden <andyb@marxists.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:andyb@marxists.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can anyone tell me when and with
>>>>>>> whom the term "sociocultural
>>>>>>> psychology" originated?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> *Andy Blunden*
>>>>>>> Hegel for Social Movements
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://brill.com/view/title/54574__;!!Mih3wA!WBIr3_zzidcxaloVcp2qUX4U6WR3f7enQ2z2gvamcdo3Ihy82L4ZkR-PgfCDASisbYxsxw$>
>>>>>>> Home Page
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm__;!!Mih3wA!WBIr3_zzidcxaloVcp2qUX4U6WR3f7enQ2z2gvamcdo3Ihy82L4ZkR-PgfCDASiXKr5OJw$>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20200516/bf8fd311/attachment.html
More information about the xmca-l
mailing list