[Xmca-l] Re: [SPAM] does this screed have an inkling of merit?

[Andy Blunden]

no

------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
Hegel for Social Movements <https://brill.com/view/title/54574>
Home Page <https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm>
On 25/02/2020 6:22 am, Anthony Barra wrote:
> To me, it seems a product of motivated reasoning and 
> confirmation bias, but I ask sincerely: *does anybody find 
> any inklings of merit in this 2014 essay?* 
> http://invisibleserfscollar.com/unveiling-the-true-focus-of-the-common-core-obuchenie-within-students-to-gain-desired-future-behaviors/ 
>
>
> I stumbled upon the article while googling "obuchenie and 
> perezhivanie," two terms I'm in the early stages of 
> understanding. The blog's proprietor writes with a lot of 
> . . . energy. (And perhaps, a cocktail of hubris and 
> pseudoconcepts - http://tiny.cc/dpbgkz )
>
> To briefly add, for whatever it's worth: I am probably 
> more familiar with the (somewhat paranoid) style of 
> argumentation in the attached essay than I am with the 
> finer points of cultural-historical theory.  But I'm not a 
> very refined consumer of either.
>
> The blogger writes in a style I'm not particularly fond of 
> -- i.e., wielding a sword and swinging it around wildly. 
> Amidst the wild swinging, I ask: *does any of it hit?*
>
> I'd be interesting in any productive thoughts at all.
>
> Thanks ~
> Anthony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20200225/ebc27cf6/attachment.html