[Xmca-l] Re: Unbelievable: number 19th strain according to Fox News?

Fri Apr 17 14:51:46 PDT 2020

The following may help bring things together, and move things forward:

1. In response to Greg's request for anything more profound, I offer a
greater degree of self-awareness, in contribution towards both cognition,
appreciation, and the spiritual.
2. In response to David's pointing to naming conventions. Yes, this is
relevant. And one can look to parallels with respect to the manner of
encountering historical ideas. E.g. the dialectical naming of
"sociotechnical" or "participant observer".
3. With respect to Bonnie's referencing personality in relation to CHAT/AT.
>From a developmental perspective one can certainly enquire into this
productively. The approach I have taken uses intentionality or active
orientation as a unit that represents a synthesis of cognition, emotion,
movement etc -- which are typically considered as a platform for
personality (e.g. MBTI).
4. Regarding distance learning. It strikes me as a natural means of student
self-selection regarding engagement and enquiry. One would hope that
turning up and switching off is less viable -- though this still seems to
be happening in work meetings from what I can gather.

Perhaps all these calamities will also help people get over the hump of the
post-modernist view that "every view is equal', and recognise that there is
leverage in the structuring and nesting of views of different scope.

Best,
Huw

On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 21:21, Helena Worthen <helenaworthen@gmail.com>
wrote:

> IMHO, “elaborations in which political positions are qualified as part of
> our arguments” are vital to the relevance of this list.
>
> The Vygotskian tradition’s roots go deep in a period of tumultuous,
> dangerous change — the Russian revolution - and the people who formulated
> it did so in the face of threats, loss of livelihood, suppression of
> research, etc. not so much because their work was revolutionary but because
> there was a revolution going on around them, stones flying everywhere.
> Vygotsky was essential to the creation of education systems in other
> countries in extreme conditions — my knowledge of this comes from Vietnam.
> Vygotsky finally came to the US despite McCarthyism etc. but here, over the
> last 30-40 years, CHAT has been, as I think we have agreed, domesticated
> and cured of its politics, to its detriment.
>
> Drawing the Vygotskian tradition and its current expressions back into the
> fray, weaving theory and the facts of the current crisis together, won’t be
> a bump-free project, but let’s keep on with it.
>
> Generally speaking, avoiding irony, sarcasm and other things that rely on
> tone of voice, and calling out someone by  name --not usually good even in
> praise (because it turns into a one-on-one).
>
> Other than that, I’m not worried, I think we’re doing fine.  —
>
> Helena Worthen
> hworthen@illinois.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 11:47 AM, Alfredo Jornet Gil <a.j.gil@ils.uio.no>
> wrote:
>
> Dear friends,
>
> It seems that this discussion is raising a number of interesting
> challenges with regards to how to co-habit this list worth considering, and
> always in the most respectful manner.
>
> One thing that I think is clear and always takes place is that when
> members use irony and/or sarcasm, even in as well intentioned as in the
> post that started this thread, there is the risk that people do not find it
> appropriate. It is not that this happens always, but obviously is something
> to consider before posting on those terms. I believe irony is a healthy and
> important resource to keep with us, just knowing it is, by nature, a
> double-edged sword.
>
> The other thing, which I believe is more challenging, is that, as it’s
> been made clear by a few participants, and by the way in the most
> considerate manner (thanks!), is that elaborations in which political
> positions are qualified as part of our arguments may be experienced as
> inappropriate. And I wonder what to do with this as a community? This is
> particularly difficult because, at least as I see it, disconnecting
> politics from theory, in a list in which issues of human mind and activity
> are intrinsically connected to culture, is really not possible. What would
> we discuss, as a community interested in CHAT related issues, if not issues
> of politics, of social in/justice, as they relate to our present and
> futures? And how can we discuss it without making reference to the
> concrete, specific historical cases, public figures, parties, realities of
> the countries we live in?
>
> And please, I am not here defending that this thread should continue, or
> that there would not be reason to feel it is not appropriate. I am just
> ignorant enough to realize that I have no clue as to what sort of
> moderation is appropriate here. So I would appreciate if no references to A
> has said this, or B has done that, are made; but would appreciate a lot a
> bit of help on this issue. I think that ignoring our colleague’s concerns
> and sensitivities is not right. But censoring political discussions, if
> these are voiced as part of an analysis of current matters of
> socio-historical relevance, does not feel right either. And please, note
> that many of us are not US citizens or residents, so you’ll have to excuse
> our ignorance.
>
> Thanks,
> Alfredo
> *From: *<xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu> on behalf of Edward Wall <
> ewall@umich.edu>
> *Reply to: *"eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> *Date: *Friday, 17 April 2020 at 01:07
> *To: *"eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> *Subject: *[Xmca-l] Re: Unbelievable: number 19th strain according to Fox
> News?
>
> Dear All
>
>      I would appreciate if we could take such discussions off list, It is
> not that I don’t sympathize with the voiced frustrations, but I wish you
> would vent them elsewhere and elsewhen.
>
> Ed
>
> Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not, and a
> sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is.
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2020, at  5:40 PM, Bonnie Nardi <nardi@ics.uci.edu> wrote:
>
> Watching the debacle of Trump reveals, to me at least, how important class
> analysis is. Trump is deranged, and his everyday actions fall completely
> outside all social norms of decency, yet he is *consistently supported* by
> (1) his Republican cohorts, (2) big business (Bill Gates: “I don’t rule out
> voting for Trump if I have to pay too much in taxes”…) and (3) the
> alienated/uneducated class who’d rather at least have the fun of throwing a
> brick through the window than put up with any more PC bs (or abortion
> rights or separation of church and state). A potent and scary mix. The
> "complicity" Greg mentioned has several sources, all class-based in my
> view, but oddly variable.
>
> Trump is a symptom of a society running off the rails. He could not have
> come to power had not the underlying conditions been ripe for it. He wasn’t
> the lesser of two evils for many voters — he was finally someone who they
> thought spoke for them whether they occupied corporate boardrooms or NASCAR
> bleachers or evangelical pews. Europe is also producing fascist-leaning
> leaders and other places have them firmly ensconced.
>
> It’s damn weird to me that we’ve gone, in my lifetime, from U.S.
> leadership in gay rights, civil rights, disability rights, and
> environmentalism,  to the current horrendous situation. (Europe has
> implemented better environmental policies but the groundwork was laid in
> the U.S.) I love the U.S. the way a parent still loves a teenager gone bad,
> but that’s beside the point, this is now global, as Julian points out.  We
> are all in this together. Neoliberalism deftly divides us (I see it, e.g.,
> in the virus discussions about how old people, are, let’s face it,
> expendable, and we worry too much about them -- the young need to get back
> to work, etc. There’s as much of this on reddit as there is from
> Republicans.)
>
> What to do? The first thing is to rethink what a society can and should
> be. As part of this exercise I recommend Andre Gorz's *Paths to Paradise*.
> It's short, sweet, and prescient. Gorz recognized that environmental
> problems come from too much frenetic economic activity and that we are
> spending too much of our lives in alienating workplaces. He recommended a
> lot more automation and a lot more sharing of wealth. He has been a
> touchstone for me and others in the Computing within LIMITS community (see
>  https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://computingwithinlimits.org/2020/__;!!Mih3wA!UgKvMi_Q37bMHLTeW45cS9hBvkeNx_rfVCA8EB1EtGiwf3QhpgZ5IcCTLUQfvtwS0IRF_g$ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/computingwithinlimits.org/2020/__;!!Mih3wA!X6Z1zy1ywvBUsh4PLzAdjWe7J-gfCIiKCjavnOndv0aE8iksRfWM1OkKDsjdIra1sk7s_Q$>
>  for all the papers going back to 2015).
>
> I think we absolutely have to address the big picture and smaller efforts
> (like growing meat in labs and so on) are not going to do much.
>
> The pandemic has shown Gorz to be right about the environment -- I have
> been astonished at how quickly air and water are clearing, how animals are
> benefiting, etc. I didn't expect all that to happen so fast. In the San
> Francisco Bay Area where I live, air pollution is down 40%. There's lots of
> good media reporting on these kinds of changes which are global.
>
> I think we must look to what CHAT has written about personality. I have
> never really understood that work but I sense that it's important. The
> culture now produces neoliberal "entrepreneurs" with their self-branding
> and paddle-your-own-canoe philosophies, but other eras produced other
> types. I live in a coastal town, and while the beach parking lots are
> closed, the surfers, walkers, and cyclists are out when they aren't
> normally out. They are probably getting their work done virtually in less
> time than normal (without a commute and the distractions of the office),
> and doing what they love doing!  Maybe we need a world of walkers and
> surfers -- that personality type. I'd be happy if people were more focused
> on knitting, and baking, and carpentry -- all those homely ways of
> producing rather than working, often for very little money, so they can buy
> everything at the store. Most of it ends up in landfills, by design, or, if
> it's food, it is so awful it contributes to the chronic diseases. Or
> working hard at high end jobs and ending up feeling one is entitled to what
> one has (the Bay Area has been badly affected by this) and that if you are
> poor it's kind of your own fault.
>
> Yes, I recognize that staying home more has costs and that we can't
> produce everything ourselves, but the solution to the big picture is not to
> send everyone off to the workplace for most of their lives but to address
> issues of violence, production, quality of life, and so on in direct ways.
> We can't rely on by-products of our current work habits to stem violence,
> for example. That is just not right.
>
> The post-growth movement in Europe is doing thoughtful work, and I
> recommend what they write. They cite Gorz (as well as Gandhi, Donella
> Meadows, and so on), and I think they are on the right track.
>
> Best,
>
> -
>
> Bonnie
>
>
>
>
> Bonnie Nardi
> Professor (Emer.)
> Department of Informatics
> School of Information and Computer Sciences
> 5088 Bren Hall
> UC Irvine 92697-3440
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://darrouzet-nardi.net/bonnie__;!!Mih3wA!UgKvMi_Q37bMHLTeW45cS9hBvkeNx_rfVCA8EB1EtGiwf3QhpgZ5IcCTLUQfvtzMWwlXDw$ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/darrouzet-nardi.net/bonnie__;!!Mih3wA!X6Z1zy1ywvBUsh4PLzAdjWe7J-gfCIiKCjavnOndv0aE8iksRfWM1OkKDsjdIrbdA0uVBQ$>
> NEW BOOK: Heteromation and Other Stories of Computing and
> Capitalism (with Hamid Ekbia, MIT Press, 2017)
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 11:14 AM, Julian Williams <
> julian.williams@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Mike, hi
>
> Surely not funny, of course. And we should have an even greater concern
> about India, where 1.4billion people are supposedly ‘shut down’ ( actually,
> many millions are walking hundreds of miles ‘home’ from the cities to their
> villages, wearing masks, but ..  ), and nationalist, anti-Muslim extremism
> - rampant before the crisis – is growing:
>
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.democracynow.org/2020/4/16/arundhati_roy_coronavirus_india?utm_source=Democracy*Now*21&utm_campaign=5b85440b98-Daily_Digest_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fa2346a853-5b85440b98-192514813__;KyU!!Mih3wA!UgKvMi_Q37bMHLTeW45cS9hBvkeNx_rfVCA8EB1EtGiwf3QhpgZ5IcCTLUQfvtzOoV1DSw$ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.democracynow.org/2020/4/16/arundhati_roy_coronavirus_india?utm_source=Democracy*Now*21&utm_campaign=5b85440b98-Daily_Digest_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fa2346a853-5b85440b98-192514813__;KyU!!Mih3wA!UAMlfob2n_Lh-WqpyVZk7kkIB6_iTHxnCHcoi9KlYa0gsgp20bbtBYAvZg22fqto0zXcVg$>
>
> We can anticipate at least 40 million deaths in India  if this gets going
> -  and the fascists are planning to emerge dominant from this – all
> encouraged by your big man in the WH.
>
> These deaths will perhaps make the holocaust seem like small fry – will we
> ever see trials for crimes against humanity? Perhaps not, because it will
> be difficult to pin these deaths on to intentional action, but maybe there
> should be a crime for intentional inaction? The abject state of public
> health systems (long term) and the incompetence and political management
> (short term) being the main charges.
>
> Then in the US we can see some analyses of the way the deaths are hugely
> discriminatory against black/ethnic minorities and the poor: “More than
> 70 per cent of COVID-19 deaths in the state of Louisiana were
> African-Americans, despite accounting for just a third of the general
> population. In New York City it's 17 per cent of deaths, for a 9 per cent
> share of residents.”
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-16/drum-covid-african-american-affected/12153268__;!!Mih3wA!UgKvMi_Q37bMHLTeW45cS9hBvkeNx_rfVCA8EB1EtGiwf3QhpgZ5IcCTLUQfvtz5hRvK6w$ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-16/drum-covid-african-american-affected/12153268__;!!Mih3wA!UAMlfob2n_Lh-WqpyVZk7kkIB6_iTHxnCHcoi9KlYa0gsgp20bbtBYAvZg22fqs1xrPL7g$>  Globally
> translated – this will become a terrible indictment of the world’s
> structure of poverty:
>
> I had to pause the other day – is this kind of admittedly political
> posting appropriate to xmca listserve’s concerns: I think that’s a question
> for xmca – “are we/is xmca relevant to the millions of deaths likely as the
> pandemic spreads to the poor nations?” The question is moot – only you
> people out there can say, or do by saying.
>
> Julian
>
> PS It’s good that in some parts of the world this information is still
> getting out. The middle east, and Africa, in many parts, maybe is more
> difficult.
>
> *From: *<xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu> on behalf of mike cole <
> mcole@ucsd.edu>
> *Reply-To: *"eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> *Date: *Thursday, 16 April 2020 at 18:36
> *To: *"eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> *Subject: *[Xmca-l] Re: FW: Unbelievable: number 19th strain according to
> Fox News?
>
> There is absolutely nothing funny about the crypto fascists running this
> government, Julian.
> Trump is pushing towar monarchy in a fashion that might be funny if it
> were a Gilbert and Sullivan
> musical.
> mike
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:27 PM Julian Williams <
> julian.williams@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Kellyanne *Conwa*y … I think I heard her name a while back – what a Con,
> Ha ha?
>
> But perhaps not so very funny, right?
>
> God help us – it all fits – and now international pandemic and the next
> step is to defenestrate our only World Health Organisation…
>
> I can’t see anything short of a massive rebellion being an appropriate
> response… get those idiots out of the white house?
>
> Julian
>
>
> *Subject: *Fwd: Unbelievable
>
> White House counselor Kellyanne Conway falsely suggested Wednesday that
> there had been 18 previous strains of the novel coronavirus as she defended
> President Trump’s decision to suspend funding to the World Health
> Organization.
>
> "This is covid-19, not covid-1, folks, and so you would think the people
> charged with the World Health Organization facts and figures would be on
> top of that,” Conway said during an interview on Fox News.
>
> In fact, the “19” at the end of the virus’s name denotes that it was
> discovered in 2019, not that it is the 19th strain of the virus. At its
> outset, it was referred to by health officials as the “2019 novel
> coronavirus.”
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> the creation of utopias – and their exhaustive criticism – is the proper
> and distinctive method of sociology.  H.G.Wells
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> For archival resources relevant to the research of myself and other
> members of LCHC, visit
> lchc.ucsd.edu.  For archival materials and a narrative history of the
> research of LCHC, visit lchcautobio.ucsd.edu.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20200417/1cf38f82/attachment.html 