[Xmca-l] Re: Do we find Inequalities in wild life system?
Andy Blunden
andyb@marxists.org
Mon Jan 28 16:16:35 PST 2019
Mmm, "subjective" is a polysemous word, Huw. It is not a
matter of precision but of relativity. "Inequality" is a
famously contested concept, as is "injustice," but its
contestation is necessarily in a social context and with
social content. Justice and equality are given objective
form in law and social policy in definite, really-existing
states or organisations challenging for state power, not the
opinion of individuals.
andy
------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden
http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
On 29/01/2019 1:50 am, Huw Lloyd wrote:
> It isn't "subjective", Andy. Rather it is limited to a
> certain construal. One can be quite precise and objective
> about that construal.
>
> Huw
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 14:14, Andy Blunden
> <andyb@marxists.org <mailto:andyb@marxists.org>> wrote:
>
> I can't agree that with your suggestion, Huw, that
> inequality (in the meaning with which Harshad used it)
> is something subjective, in the eye of the beholder.
> Such a view would be very pernicious politically. The
> fact is that states have emerged and developed over
> many centuries so as to makes objective certain
> concepts of justice, among which are various qualified
> and nuances notions of equality. This is not figment
> of my imagination.
>
> andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Blunden
> http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
> On 29/01/2019 12:59 am, Huw Lloyd wrote:
>> We find "wild life" systems that are imbalanced and
>> subject to radical changes.
>>
>> Inequality is a perceptual/cognitive construct and
>> predicated on an ontological scope. We find the
>> condition of inequality (or comparison) in our
>> thinking and behaviour. Every living thing "finds"
>> inequalities. We do not find inequality, we find the
>> awareness of inequality.
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 08:17, James Ma
>> <jamesma320@gmail.com <mailto:jamesma320@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Should you find inequality within a wildlife
>> system, that must be a political, ideological
>> precept!
>>
>> James
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 07:56, James Ma
>> <jamesma320@gmail.com
>> <mailto:jamesma320@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Not only is it meaningless but also
>> preposterous. To maintain that all members of
>> the same species are equal, as Anne Moir and
>> David Jessel put it, is to "build a society
>> based on a biological and scientific lie".
>> James
>> PS: I'm apolitical - anything political,
>> ideological just doesn't speak to me!
>>
>> */_______________________________________________________/*
>>
>> /*James Ma *Independent Scholar
>> //https://oxford.academia.edu/JamesMa
>> /
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 05:27, Andy Blunden
>> <andyb@marxists.org
>> <mailto:andyb@marxists.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Harshad,
>>
>> "Inequality" is a meaningless concept
>> when referred to Nature. Likewise
>> "Injustice."
>>
>> Justice and equality are relevant only to
>> the extent that the subjects are living
>> in an 'artificial' world, out of Nature.
>> Natural disasters and the plenitude of
>> Nature have these dimensions only to the
>> extent they are imposed on or made
>> available to different classes of people
>> by the social system.
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Andy Blunden
>> http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
>>
>> On 28/01/2019 4:00 pm, Harshad Dave wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am working on one article. I want to
>>> know your views on following query.
>>>
>>> "Do we find Inequalities exists in wild
>>> life system?"
>>>
>>> Your views will help me in my work.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Harshad Dave
>>> Email: hhdave15@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:hhdave15@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20190129/517a055c/attachment.html
More information about the xmca-l
mailing list