[Xmca-l] Re: Views are requested.

[Harshad Dave]

Andy,
Thanks for your help. I shall open the site and study them. I shall revert
back, if I find points of further discussion.
Harshad Dave


On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 5:15 PM Andy Blunden, <andyb@marxists.org> wrote:

> Dave, this is not a list where you can get a coherent answer to your
> question - there are very many different answers,
>
> I suggest you browse the various views that historically have been put
> forward here: https://www.marxists.org/archive/selected-marxists.htm
>
> Andy
> ------------------------------
> Andy Blunden
> http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
> On 31/08/2018 12:12 AM, Harshad Dave wrote:
>
>
> Dear All,
> This is with reference to the article “The Working Class Strikes Back” by
> Chris Wright.
>
> (Link:  <https://www.academia.edu/37306144/The_Working_Class_Strikes_Back>
> https://www.academia.edu/37306144/The_Working_Class_Strikes_Back)
>
> USSR and China were the two countries that passed through the revolution
> and socialist rule prevailed there. Both the countries faced hard time
> initially, achieved progress also and ultimately they had to bring some
> compromise, somewhere in between capitalism and Socialism perhaps. I think
> there must be impartial study and review in this matter i. e. where the
> things went wrong. I have tried at my level and I put my views as follow,
> Generally, if a fresh and impartial young person goes through the
> socialist literature in books, articles, speeches and correspondences, he
> will surely get one impression. If I narrate the impression in one
> sentence, it might read as….,
> “The capitalistic society is constituted in two tents named “bourgeois
> tent” and “proletariat tent”. The bourgeois are the root cause of grief and
> peril of this society. Proletariat should take over the rule of the society
> in their hand and they should regulate and control the social system in
> compliance with socialist policy and principles.”
> Personally I am neither in favor of bourgeois nor opponent of proletariat,
> I have studied the nature, choices and intentions of proletariat, they are
> good people but they are not immune from capitalistic mind set. I do not
> criticize them for that because it has to be that only. Likewise, bourgeois
> are exploitative and moral less people but both (bourgeois and proletariat)
> are product of social evolution.
> It is the great mistake forefathers of socialism did and that is
> exclusively concentrating on the above two tents. In fact reasons of social
> peril lie elsewhere. Existence of two tents of bourgeois and proletariat is
> the resultant product of social evolution. Even if proletariat successfully
> take over the rule of a society in their hand, the fundamental reasons of
> the root cause of the social peril still remains there. When socialism does
> not have knowledge of these reasons, how they will be able to establish a
> social structure that they dream.
> Your views will support to arrive near to the fact finding.
> With true regards,
>
>
>
> Harshad Dave
> Email: <hhdave15@gmail.com>hhdave15@gmail.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20180831/3f57a939/attachment.html