[Xmca-l] Re: ISCAR experiences, reflections, etc
Antti Rajala
ajrajala@gmail.com
Thu Sep 7 11:12:34 PDT 2017
Thanks a lot for these elaborations. Very inspiring discussion. I am also
reminded of Andy's effort to revise Leontjev's ideas through the lens of
more contemporary theorizing of society. This I see as a sign of a living
tradition.
Someone asked for the abstracts of the Ratner and Teo session in a private
message. You can find the whole: http book of abstracts at
www2.rikkyo.ac.jp/web/istp2017/downloadfiles/ISTP2017proceedings0808web.pdf
Below is Teo's abstract
Best, Antti
Presentation 2: With Marx, Beyond Marx: Elements of a critical theory of
subjectivity
Thomas Teo, York University, tteo@yorku.ca
Marx applied historical thinking to his own theory and suggested that one
should not use his theory as a dogma. Yet, he also set out basic principles
for a theory of subjectivity with his emphasis on what I would call
socio-subjectivity and the notion that intra-subjectivity (the focus of
traditional psychology) as well as inter-subjectivity (emphasized by
hermeneutic, dialogical, and some phenomenological approaches) are part of
socio-subjectivity. The theoretical task is to connect and understand the
relationship between these three forms of subjectivity. But
socio-subjectivity itself is not a static entity but changes according to
transformations in society, economy, and culture. As Marx understood, a
theory of subjectivity needs to understand the reality of capitalism, and
one should add now, neo-liberalism. Changes in capitalist society such as
capital as power and modes of exchange, in addition to modes of production,
new forms of dispossession in conjuncture with new embodiments of identity,
need to be accounted for. Neo-liberalism produces new forms of ideology,
and a strong case is made, to keep to a Marxist concept of ideology,
despite the criticisms of false consciousness since poststructuralism. It
is argued that living in a post-truth world it is crucial to keep to the
concept of ideology. However, I suggest that ideology needs to be augmented
by a concept of bodiology, with the body as carrier of distorted images. It
is suggested that Marx needs to be read, understood, and applied
historically, which would be Marx’s own intention. Ideas for traditional
and new forms of resistance are discussed.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Greg Thompson <greg.a.thompson@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'd like to second Andy's point about the importance of revisiting Marx
> (and yes, Hegel too) to discover anew his ideas.
>
> When I was a grad student teaching in the undergraduate core sequence at
> the University of Chicago, an instructor in a meeting about the course
> commented that the neo-liberal ideology of free market capitalism was
> dominating students' thinking in these core courses. In response,
> sociologist John Levy-Martin noted that Marx is the "nuclear submarine of
> social theory" and that the neo-liberal economic theory was nothing more
> than a bunch of pea shooters.
>
> Although I'm not a fan of the weaponizing metaphor, I think there is
> something to the larger point that Marx's work still holds a great deal of
> promise even today. (and I might add that here in America scholars assume
> that Vygotsky is entirely detachable from Marx - that may be a survival
> mechanism for many Vygotsky-ians (given the anti-Marx/anti-Communist
> sentiment in the U.S.), but it is also very unfortunate, so I'm very glad
> to see the Vygotsky and Marx book).
>
> I am lucky enough to regularly have the opportunity to teach Marx to
> undergraduate anthropologists. One thing that is very clear to me is that
> Marx's way of thinking is astonishingly novel - so much so that it is a
> near impossible chore to try and get these American undergraduates to
> understand what he is saying (precisely because his way of thinking is too
> foreign to the average American raised in the midst of unbridled capitalism
> with all its ideology, obfuscations, and enticements). And the few that
> "get" Marx are equipped with an incredibly powerful tool for thinking
> (anthropologically) about and making the world anew.
>
> -greg
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:
>
> > With Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, epistemology and ontology all
> became
> > obsolete really. Marx's ideas on these topics have to be gleaned from
> > occasional remarks and unpublished notes. But, taking the Theses on
> > Feuerbach, and the key passages in the German Ideology and the Grundrisse
> > as defining "Marx's epistemology and ontology" then I would say we are
> > still waiting for a time when this standpoint will come into its own.
> >
> > Do we have a reviewer for that book yet?
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Andy Blunden
> > http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
> > https://andyblunden.academia.edu/research
> > On 7/09/2017 1:44 AM, Antti Rajala wrote:
> >
> >> Andy, thanks for these thoughts and your welcoming words. I agree with
> >> your reading of the Vygotsky's essay. I think Vygotsky also said that
> the
> >> Marxist psychology could not be found in Marx's text but had to be
> created.
> >> In this he used Marx method, as you pointed out.
> >>
> >> I am no expert of Marxism but found the discussion in the symposium
> >> interesting. The discussion was sparked by the presentations of Carl
> Ratner
> >> and Thomas Teo respectively. If I remember it right, Teo complemented
> >> Marx's original insights with some more postmodernist theorizing,
> whereas
> >> Ratner appeared to rely more on a more traditional reading of Marx.
> >>
> >> Andy, to what extent do you think that the ontological/epistemological
> >> foundation of Marx is still valid today? (perhaps too broad a
> question). I
> >> am looking forward to read the hopefully forthcoming review of the
> edited
> >> volume by Ratner and Nunes Henrique Silva on Vygotsky and Marx in MCA.
> >>
> >> Antti
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net
> <mailto:
> >> ablunden@mira.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Antti,
> >>
> >> I think the development of a tradition of practice
> >> (such as Marxism) means continually returning to the
> >> original sources and *digging deeper* into them, while
> >> responding to the problems thrown up by the present
> >> world. What Vygotsky ridiculed was not just the
> >> re-assertion of the original sources, but their
> >> mindless and superficial repetition. Whenever Marxism
> >> has fallen into crisis, it has sparked a "return to
> >> Marx" - not to go back to an original truth, but to
> >> look again at what was being taken for granted, and
> >> find new sources of inspiration. Vygotsky did this in
> >> his reading of /Capital/ in particular.
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> (PS Nice to hear your voice on this list, Antti)
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Andy Blunden
> >> http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
> >> <http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm>
> >> https://andyblunden.academia.edu/research
> >> <https://andyblunden.academia.edu/research>
> >>
> >> On 6/09/2017 3:29 PM, Antti Rajala wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> In ISTP (Theory & Psychology) conference in Tokyo
> >> a couple of weeks ago
> >> there was a session on Vygotsky and Marxism, in
> >> which a similar issue was
> >> raised: whether the Marxist research should be
> >> continually updated as a
> >> living tradition or be more original to the
> >> sources. Wasn't it Vygotsky
> >> himself who emphasized the former position in his
> >> essay on the Crisis of
> >> Psychology when he mocked people who were just
> >> picking citations from Marx
> >> book and pretending that's Marxist psychology.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Rod Parker-Rees <
> >> R.Parker-Rees@plymouth.ac.uk
> >> <mailto:R.Parker-Rees@plymouth.ac.uk>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Alfredo,
> >>
> >> Yes, my feeling is that it is better if
> >> different people are able to
> >> pursue different paths so they are able to
> >> develop (and hopefully share)
> >> different perspectives. One of the things we
> >> take away from a conference
> >> (as, in different ways, from other forms of
> >> interaction) is a richer sense
> >> of the ways in which other people see things
> >> differently. Knowing a bit
> >> about how others see things helps to enrich
> >> the possibilities available to
> >> us - so we become more than just our own selves.
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >>
> >> Rod
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu
> >> <mailto:xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> >> [mailto:xmca-l-bounces@ <mailto:xmca-l-bounces@>
> >> mailman.ucsd.edu <http://mailman.ucsd.edu>] On
> >> Behalf Of Alfredo Jornet Gil
> >> Sent: 05 September 2017 21:59
> >> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> >> <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu
> >> <mailto:xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>>
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: ISCAR experiences,
> >> reflections, etc
> >>
> >> I think I got this e-mail back from the
> >> server, here I try again.
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: Alfredo Jornet Gil
> >> Sent: 05 September 2017 19:07
> >> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> >> Subject: Re: ISCAR experiences, reflections, etc
> >>
> >> Jaakko, yes, I agree with you those in between
> >> sessions, and the after
> >> sessions too, are part of the best these type
> >> of congress offers. I am
> >> happy I could enjoy some of that with you in
> >> Quebec! It was a real pleasure.
> >>
> >> Rod, yes, it would have been so great meeting
> >> you too. In any case,
> >> concerning perezhivanie and other notions, I
> >> am glad thta you bring this
> >> distinction between those who seek to defend
> >> some 'core, true meaning', and
> >> those who attempt to bring those notions into
> >> new uses etc. This seems to
> >> be at the heart of the field today, and
> >> definitely resonates with
> >> discussions having gone on here. I don't
> >> think, (nor probably do you) that
> >> in most cases the dichotomy is that
> >> straightforward; rather, there seems to
> >> be a tension between one's efforts to build on
> >> a given body of scholar work
> >> in a coherent manner, and one's goals of
> >> addressing real, contemporary
> >> problems. I feel that here at xmca we tend to
> >> be very strong on the former
> >> effort, but could be better in the latter.
> >> Just my sense. Cheers, Alfredo
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu
> >> <mailto:xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> >> <xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu
> >> <mailto:xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu>>
> >> on behalf of Rod Parker-Rees
> >> <R.Parker-Rees@plymouth.ac.uk
> >> <mailto:R.Parker-Rees@plymouth.ac.uk>>
> >>
> >> Sent: 05 September 2017 11:17
> >> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: ISCAR experiences,
> >> reflections, etc
> >>
> >> Dear Alfredo,
> >>
> >> I am sorry I did not get the opportunity to
> >> meet you at ISCAR.
> >>
> >> The highlight of the conference for me was the
> >> opportunity to explore a
> >> wide range of different perspectives on key
> >> aspects of cultural-historical
> >> research. The first meeting of the round-table
> >> discussion group focusing on
> >> perezhivanie was well attended and somewhat
> >> chaotic, as a lot of people set
> >> out their own understanding of the
> >> significance of this concept. Here there
> >> was only time for an initial presentation of
> >> positions - and the beginnings
> >> of exploration of disagreements but the topic
> >> was also addressed in many
> >> paper presentations and the second and third
> >> round-table meetings were
> >> smaller, allowing more extensive discussion,
> >> which I thought was
> >> particularly valuable in clarifying why
> >> perezhivanie is such a useful (and
> >> flexible) concept.
> >>
> >> Discussions at the conference illustrated the
> >> tensions between those who
> >> seek to defend a core, 'true' meaning (through
> >> careful historical analysis
> >> of documents and arguments) and those who want
> >> to loosen the boundaries of
> >> what 'counts' as perezhivanie so that the
> >> concept can be used in new ways
> >> and in new contexts. Having the opportunity to
> >> take conversations forward
> >> beyond initial disagreement helped me to see
> >> the 'agreed' meaning
> >> (znachenie) of perezhivanie as a fluid,
> >> dynamic product of continuing
> >> interactions - both influencing and influenced
> >> by the particular
> >> refractions of individual interpretations
> >> (smysl). Our 'own' understanding
> >> is immeasurably enriched by opportunities to
> >> encounter and engage with
> >> other people's perspectives - not just what
> >> they think and know but also
> >> what they care about! My understanding of the
> >> writing of Fernando Gonzalez
> >> Rey, Anna Stetsenko, Barbara Rogoff, Nikolai
> >> Veresov and many others will
> >> be informed by what I have learned from seeing
> >> how they present their own
> >> understandings but also, in different but
> >> equally important ways, from
> >> seeing how they engage with other people and
> >> with other people's ideas.
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >>
> >> Rod
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu
> >> <mailto:xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> >> [mailto:xmca-l-bounces@ <mailto:xmca-l-bounces@>
> >> mailman.ucsd.edu <http://mailman.ucsd.edu>] On
> >> Behalf Of Alfredo Jornet Gil
> >> Sent: 02 September 2017 19:36
> >> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> >> <xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu
> >> <mailto:xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>>
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] ISCAR experiences,
> >> reflections, etc
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >>
> >> I am still at Tampere, where the EARLI
> >> conference finished today, just one
> >> day after ISCAR ended. Unfortunately, I
> >> committed to attending both
> >> conferences and could only be the first days
> >> in Quebec. Still, I was
> >> fortunate enough to catch up with many
> >> colleagues, to share some of my
> >> work, and get to hear about that of many
> >> others that are doing great things
> >> around the globe.
> >>
> >>
> >> One (not so) surprising discovery I made was
> >> the huge amount of people
> >> that actually lurks into this list, but who
> >> nonetheless very seldom if ever
> >> write (whether for lack of time to delve into
> >> the sometimes quite long
> >> posts/themes, or simply because they prefer to
> >> read than write). We all
> >> knew and had talked about this, but it was
> >> quite remarkable the amount of
> >> people I met (not only in ISCAR, but also here
> >> in Europe (EARLI).
> >>
> >>
> >> So, now that I have met some of you, and that
> >> you have got to see and hear
> >> more of ISCAR than those of us who had to
> >> leave earlier or could not join
> >> at all. What was your highlight of the
> >> congress and why? It would be lovely
> >> if some of you would take a step forward and
> >> tell us a bit of what you
> >> found most interesting, what you found was
> >> missing, what you found should
> >> have not been.
> >>
> >>
> >> In can be the first: One of my favourite
> >> moments was listening to Fernando
> >> G. Rey present without slides or any other
> >> device, passionately talking
> >> about child development and claiming, "... for
> >> the first need of the child
> >> is that of contact with other people"... I
> >> also very much enjoyed seeing
> >> Mike in a several meters wide screen
> >> commenting on Engeström's Keynote,
> >> rising the longest ovation I got to hear
> >> during my brief three days in
> >> Quebec.
> >>
> >>
> >> These are just anecdotes, but I would love if
> >> you could tell us more on
> >> how it went for you, what you found there, for
> >> us who could not be there. I
> >> think it would be very much appreciated by
> >> many, while we get the time to
> >> have a look at the issue on unit analysis, and
> >> prepare the discussion on
> >> the article from the last (third) MCA issue.
> >>
> >>
> >> Alfredo
> >> ________________________________
> >> [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif
> >> <http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif>]<http:
> >> //www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass
> >>
> >> <http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass>>
> >>
> >> This email and any files with it are
> >> confidential and intended solely for
> >> the use of the recipient to whom it is
> >> addressed. If you are not the
> >> intended recipient then copying, distribution
> >> or other use of the
> >> information contained is strictly prohibited
> >> and you should not rely on it.
> >> If you have received this email in error
> >> please let the sender know
> >> immediately and delete it from your system(s).
> >> Internet emails are not
> >> necessarily secure. While we take every care,
> >> Plymouth University accepts
> >> no responsibility for viruses and it is your
> >> responsibility to scan emails
> >> and their attachments. Plymouth University
> >> does not accept responsibility
> >> for any changes made after it was sent.
> >> Nothing in this email or its
> >> attachments constitutes an order for goods or
> >> services unless accompanied
> >> by an official order form.
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif
> >> <http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif>]<http:
> >> //www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass
> >> <http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass>>
> >>
> >> This email and any files with it are
> >> confidential and intended solely for
> >> the use of the recipient to whom it is
> >> addressed. If you are not the
> >> intended recipient then copying, distribution
> >> or other use of the
> >> information contained is strictly prohibited
> >> and you should not rely on it.
> >> If you have received this email in error
> >> please let the sender know
> >> immediately and delete it from your system(s).
> >> Internet emails are not
> >> necessarily secure. While we take every care,
> >> Plymouth University accepts
> >> no responsibility for viruses and it is your
> >> responsibility to scan emails
> >> and their attachments. Plymouth University
> >> does not accept responsibility
> >> for any changes made after it was sent.
> >> Nothing in this email or its
> >> attachments constitutes an order for goods or
> >> services unless accompanied
> >> by an official order form.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Anthropology
> 880 Spencer W. Kimball Tower
> Brigham Young University
> Provo, UT 84602
> WEBSITE: greg.a.thompson.byu.edu
> http://byu.academia.edu/GregoryThompson
>
More information about the xmca-l
mailing list