[Xmca-l] Re: Отв: Re: Отв: Re: Object oriented activity and communication

[Andy Blunden]

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/p3.htm

    Of course the method of presentation must differ in form
    from that of inquiry. The latter has to appropriate the
    material in detail, to analyse its different forms of
    development, to trace out their inner connexion. Only
    after this work is done, can the actual movement be
    adequately described. If this is done successfully, if
    the life of the subject-matter is ideally reflected as
    in a mirror, then it may appear as if we had before us a
    mere a priori construction.

Andy

------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden
http://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/index.htm
On 20/10/2017 3:23 AM, Martin John Packer wrote:
> Seems to me that if we’re going to talk about the details of Marx’s analysis we need to look not at Capital but at the Grundrisse. The two have virtually opposite organizations; it’s clear that the order of presentation in Capital was not the order of analysis.
>
> Martin
>
>
>