[Xmca-l] Re: 2017 Issue 2 Discussion: Weavers Agency

[Lplarry]

This sentence on page 132 paragraph 2 seems pivotal:

.... As artifacts participate fully in constructing the farmers actions, cognitions, and agency 
As...

Partners of humans rather than instruments in their hands.



This distinction seems relevant to this approach to agency

Sent from my Windows 10 phone

From: Lplarry
Sent: May 25, 2017 8:21 AM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: RE: [Xmca-l] 2017 Issue 2 Discussion: Weavers Agency

I am reading this tribute to Naoki Ueno, a longtime participant in the chat and MCA communities. 
The article is in 3sections, and my comment will focus on section 1 page 131, paragraph two.

This paragraph contrasts ANT (Pickering) with CHAT (Kaptelinin and Nardi).

The discussion explicitly focuses upon the theme of (symmetry and asymmetry) between human agency and material technical agency.

The focus of ANT approaches human agency as a hybridization of (humans and nonhumans) as they are:

Inseparably related to each other. 

ANT originates from the removal of the division (the fold) between humans and nonhumans, the fold between subject and object, the fold between individual and social. The explicit intent is to volitionally (bridge) the gap and move (beyond) this boundary marking/fold.

What VANISHES with this move is the key focus upon symmetry and asymmetry. By assuming humans and nonhumans act Equitably (with equality) the boundary fold VANISHES.
CHAT puts in question this vanishing act

Sent from my Windows 10 phone

From: Alfredo Jornet Gil
Sent: May 24, 2017 12:16 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] 2017 Issue 2 Discussion: Weavers Agency

Dear all,



MCA's Issue 2 has been out for a couple of weeks now and it is time to bring it up for discussion here at xmca. The issue is a tribute to Naoki Ueno, a long time contributor to the MCA and CHAT communities who sadly and suddenly passed away two years ago. The issue is a symposium including three original articles, one of which is co-authored by Ueno. The issue also includes four commentaries by American colleagues who, as Mike describes in his editorial, came to know and appreciate Ueno over many decades.



For the purpose of discussion here at XMCA, we have chosen the original article written by Yasuko Kawatoko, Ueno's close collaborator ?whose scholarship represents well ?his intellectual heritage at the same time that offers an interesting empirical case. The article, titled "Forming and Transforming Weavers' Agency: Agency in Sociotechnical Arrangements" (attached) presents a case study of a women weavers' group in Central Japan, the Yuzuru Party, whose goal is to preserve and share traditional hand-weaving skills. The study draws on actor-network theory notions that also populated Ueno's work. It examines the ways in which the weaving group develops "agency" as "sociotechnical arrangements" are reconfigured due to changes associated to the place of Matsusaka cotton in the city's cultural and political context.



The paper covers a range of issues important to the MCA community, perhaps most centrally those related to the notion of agency, and is relevant to recent discussions held here at xmca dealing with the central question of the role of "artifacts" in human development. The author, Yasuko Kawatoko, who also has written an introduction to the special issue, has kindly agreed to join us in the discussion and will introduce herself soon. I am making other contributors to the special issue aware of the discussion in case they wished to join us too. I hope many of you engage and I look forward to a very productive discussion.?


Alfredo