[Xmca-l] Re: Trump's speech and Perezhivanie

[lpscholar2@gmail.com]

Martin,
This article in the Atlantic struck a cord. The folks who actually lost a way of life did not vote for Trump. White males with a high school diploma are the group who most inhabit a social situation without hope for the future. 
So... The central phenomena is anticipatory anxiety. This can be explored as the (not-yet) the potential, the possible, the un-known, the un-certain, the sense of loosing what one now has. The lack or withdrawal of ‘hope’ re/placed by ‘dread’, and ‘forboding’

The question then becomes how to re-generate hope among folk who now anticipate the future leading to dread?

Perezhivanie being the experience of once having hope, but now that hope has withdrawn from the ‘scene’. Life stands still.

Sent from my Windows 10 phone

From: Greg Thompson
Sent: January 22, 2017 7:51 AM
To: Andy Blunden; eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Trump's speech and Perezhivanie

Andy,
A decade or so? not very optimistic (but perhaps accurate).

A few thoughts:

1. Hillary wasn't just talking about the way people speak, she referred to
them (as they understood it) as a "basket of deplorables" (and previously
Obama had that comment about these people "clinging to their guns and
religion" - that pissed a lot of these people off too). Here is a
collection of t-shirts supporting Trump that make reference to Clinton's
quote about deplorables:
https://www.spreadshirt.com/adorable+deplorable+t-shirts
Hard to know exactly what these mean to someone wearing them, or how they
feel about it, but I bet that they wouldn't think that it was saying "I'm a
racist" (although other people might think this).

2. I'm still a perezhivanie neophyte and am wondering how perezhivanie
might be linked to something beyond the individual (as we saw yesterday in
the marches, and, yes, the day before in those in solidarity and support
for Trump). What of something like "the mood of the country" or at least of
a group? How does perezhivanie speak to that? Is this simply a "collection"
of individual perezhivanie? Or is the whole greater than the sum of the
parts?

Just some initial thoughts/questions.
-greg


On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:

> Greg,
>
> As Marc has made clear, we can talk about perezhivanie with reference to
> Trump's capture of the Presidency at several different levels.
>
> I chose to interpret the directions very literally and discussed listening
> to the Inauguration Speech as an experience, that is, as one of innumerable
> perezhivaniya in my life through which my view on things has been formed.
> As Helena points out, listening to this speech would be a different
> experience for men and women who live with industrial decline, and have
> been humiliated countless times by professionals like Hillary picking on
> their way of speaking. But this speech is only one moment in an experience
> for them which will be decades long. It is doubtful if this Speech will be
> a very significant moment in the perezhivanie of a Trump voter. The crucial
> moment will be some incident when suddenly the whole episode takes on a new
> meaning, perhaps betrayal, perhaps life-changing redemption, who can tell?
>
> The perezhivanie of listening to Trump's speech is not going to be a fully
> developed perezhivanie because if you knew he was a conman what you heard
> only confirmed that; if you thought he was the saviour of the nation, the
> Speech confirms that too. It is the experience which does not confirm but
> overthrows one's view which belong to perezhivanie. Such a moment (e.g. the
> announcement from the medical professional that you do not have access to
> the procedure needed to save your life) is not in itself the perezhivanie,
> which includes the process of digesting this news and re-organising your
> life accordingly.
>
> There is, as Mike referred to, also the issue of a collective
> perezhivanie, of the entire nation discovering what Trump's election is all
> about and overcoming it. Give America a decade or so. The Vietnam War is
> something comparable, I think.
>
> Andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Blunden
> http://home.mira.net/~andy
> http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making
> On 22/01/2017 6:21 PM, Greg Thompson wrote:
>
>> Loving everything I'm seeing on facebook about the marches today around
>> the
>> country and around the world. Really inspiring stuff, particularly after
>> what happened yesterday. And yes, there is a feeling, a mood here that
>> gives me great hope. (and thanks Peg for the sign slogan, I posted it to
>> my
>> fb page).
>>
>> But back to the nasty business that Alfredo proposed we deal with, here is
>> a description of some of Mr. Trump's words:
>> "Mr. Trump on Friday described the nation as a landscape of “rusted-out
>> factories scattered like tombstones” and inner cities infested with crime,
>> gangs and drugs."
>> I wonder, for whom might this resonate?
>>
>> Similarly, who would accept the premise of this statement:
>> "The American carnage stops right here and stops right now,"
>> I fear that this is striking a nerve with many people's perezhivanie
>> abuilding over the past 10 years or so (I'm still a little unsure of how
>> best to use perezhivanie, help please). Anyway, I'm still wondering about
>> the circumstances and experiences of Trump sympathizers. Some of you out
>> there must have some first-hand contact with such folks.
>>
>> But perhaps this is getting too far afield from CHAT since it seems like
>> it
>> starts to get into an area of communication theory called Media Ecology -
>> the media environments of people in various places (The problem of the
>> (media) environment?).
>>
>> Alfredo, Peg, Helena, Andy, maybe you guys can give us some advice about
>> how to go about treating Trump's speech in a CHAT kind of way? How to
>> proceed with this endeavor?
>>
>> -greg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Helena Worthen <helenaworthen@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello -
>>>
>>> I hope we pause and consider Alfredo’s suggestion.  Thank you, Alfredo
>>> for
>>> the phrase “gut feeling of true tragedy.” Can we work with that?
>>>
>>> How, given the xmca medium of long-chain texts from voices all over the
>>> world, would we carry out such a project? Let me see if I can say
>>> Alfredo’s
>>> proposal in my own words: to read Trump’s speech at his inauguration and
>>> ask, “Who could find this speech hopeful, inspiring, uplifting,
>>> comforting?
>>> Who would listen to it and think, ‘I am glad I voted for this man and I
>>> am
>>> glad he is my President.’”  But also ask, “Who could find this speech
>>> horrifying and frightening? This man Trump is lying to us all and I am
>>> sick
>>> to think that he is my President.” The social situation — like the
>>> alcoholic mother in the case with the three children each with a
>>> different
>>> perezvhanie - is the same for both people who are listening to the
>>> speech,
>>> but the people (like the children) respond differently.
>>>
>>> This sounds to me like a project for going out and finding strangers to
>>> talk with. Thank you, Greg, for bringing attention to Arlie Hochschild's
>>> book, Strangers in their Own Land. I have only read the first chapter of
>>> it, but I think this is what she is trying to do: give us insight into
>>> the
>>> person who might find the inauguration speech something other than a case
>>> of a celebrity clown practicing The Big Lie.
>>>
>>> Joe and I spent today at the Women’s March in Oakland, California. The
>>> police estimated 60,000 people there. Although there was supposed to be
>>> first a march and then a rally, there were too many people to fit into
>>> the
>>> streets between the starting point of the march and the destination, so
>>> many marchers never got to the end. However, that didn’t seem to be a
>>> problem. there were all kinds of small (200 person) gatherings going on
>>> all
>>> over the place. The mood was cheerful, mainstream, determined, friendly —
>>> tremendous variety of signs including the one that Peg saw in DC about
>>> regulating women’s bodies but not corporations. I actually feel better
>>> right now than I did yesterday at this time. There sure were a lot of us
>>> out there. So my perezvhanie has been expanded by a day on the street.
>>>
>>> Helena
>>>
>>>
>>> Helena Worthen
>>> helenaworthen@gmail.com
>>> Berkeley, CA 94707
>>> Blog about US and Viet Nam: helenaworthen.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Greg Thompson <greg.a.thompson@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alfredo,
>>>> I find this to be a fantastic suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> One interesting analysis that helps us understand the
>>>>
>>> circumstances/context
>>>
>>>> in which many people experience Trump's speech as beautiful, even
>>>>
>>> hopeful,
>>>
>>>> is this book:
>>>> http://thenewpress.com/books/strangers-their-own-land
>>>>
>>>> Democracy Now did a nice interview with her as well:
>>>> https://www.democracynow.org/2016/9/28/what_drives_trump_
>>>>
>>> supporters_sociologist_arlie
>>>
>>>> In the book (and the interview) Hochschild engages with, among others,
>>>>
>>> the
>>>
>>>> question of why someone who has had been directly deleteriously affected
>>>>
>>> by
>>>
>>>> the impact of fracking and oil production would support politicians who
>>>>
>>> are
>>>
>>>> against government regulation of those industries. She appears to deal
>>>>
>>> with
>>>
>>>> the situation very thoughtfully and compassionately, helping those of us
>>>> who can't understand Trump supporters see how they might have a
>>>> different
>>>> experience of what Trump has to say.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully this doesn't take too far off track, but seems relevant to
>>>>
>>> really
>>>
>>>> consider the circumstances of Trump supporters in order to understand
>>>>
>>> their
>>>
>>>> experiences.
>>>>
>>>> Just a thought.
>>>>
>>>> -greg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:29 PM, <lpscholar2@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Alfredo,
>>>>> I will share an impression I had as I listened to a particular group
>>>>>
>>>> being
>>>
>>>> interviewed who were inspired by the Trump speech.
>>>>> The group were ‘the biker’s for Trump’. I asked what symbolic form they
>>>>> were inhabiting or living out? The answer i came up with was the modern
>>>>> symbolic of being ‘On the Road Again’ and distancing from the perceived
>>>>> limitations of social con/striction. Then Thelma and Louise came to
>>>>>
>>>> mind.
>>>
>>>> Now how does this modern American cultural imaginary of being on the
>>>>>
>>>> road
>>>
>>>> again  inter/sect with Trump’s speech.
>>>>> Trump said now there is only the future. No doubling back. The form
>>>>> changes, but there is a deeper (layered) imaginary being expressed that
>>>>>
>>>> is
>>>
>>>> shared between the biker’s for Trump and Trump’s speech. This symbolic
>>>>> (taking multiple forms) is profoundly anti-historical in rhetoric. It
>>>>> creates ‘dramatic places’ in which people ‘fall into’ and become
>>>>>
>>>> animated
>>>
>>>> and encouraged and re-enchanted and re-vitalized. There is a re/lease
>>>>>
>>>> from
>>>
>>>> perceived constraints.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alfredo, My impression watching the inauguration and the motivating
>>>>> dramatic place Trump opens for some while sending a shudder down the
>>>>>
>>>> spine
>>>
>>>> for others. The myth of escape from the shackles of history runs deep
>>>>>
>>>> as a
>>>
>>>> symbolic imaginary that takes multiple ‘forms’ in the American dream.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is only one quick pass through as an impression.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Alfredo Jornet Gil
>>>>> Sent: January 21, 2017 12:46 PM
>>>>> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
>>>>> Subject: [Xmca-l] Trump's speech and Perezhivanie
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Helena, Andy, all,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, I have not been able to find the time to watch the movie
>>>>> Fate of a Man, but I have followed the very interesting analyses and
>>>>> conversations about it. I am opening this thread as connexions between
>>>>> those analyses, perezhivanie, and current tragic social and political
>>>>> situation in the US and elsewhere. This also connects with the article
>>>>>
>>>> that
>>>
>>>> Mike shared on the position of the Learning Sciences with regard to this
>>>>> situation (how happy I was to see this initiative!).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In particular, I wanted to pick up on Helena's very true comment that
>>>>>
>>>> "the
>>>
>>>> US is going to have to produce some works of scholarship or art, or
>>>>>
>>>> both,
>>>
>>>> that attempt to explain what is happening now here in the US -- for
>>>>> example, this afternoon, under President Trump."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yesterday, we saw at home Trump's speech. Although we had followed
>>>>>
>>>> Trump's
>>>
>>>> campaign and its denigrating tenor, it was yesterday, for the first
>>>>>
>>>> time,
>>>
>>>> that my wife and me got this gut feeling of true tragedy, of a real
>>>>>
>>>> *drama*
>>>
>>>> as we heard those empty, but to recover the prior article for
>>>>>
>>>> discussion,
>>>
>>>> hollowed and hollowing words coming out of that mouth. It came upon us
>>>>>
>>>> that
>>>
>>>> there may be lots of people for whom those words are not hollowed, but
>>>>> actually encouraging, rich, beautiful. How can you hear that as beauty?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I was wondering, and in following up with our 2016 MCA Issue 4
>>>>> discussion,  whether we could not actually conduct an analysis of the
>>>>>
>>>> sort
>>>
>>>> Marc offers in his article of the perezhivanie. Just as Vygotsky
>>>>>
>>>> explains
>>>
>>>> how 3 different children experience the situation of an alcoholic mother
>>>>> differently, could not we perform an analysis ?of that perezhivanie in
>>>>> which a person experiences yesterday's situation as one of
>>>>>
>>>> encouragement,
>>>
>>>> of freedom and hope. Would that not be a way to try to understand what
>>>>>
>>>> is
>>>
>>>> going on? This would not be a piece of art, but could be something we
>>>>>
>>>> could
>>>
>>>> do to try to understand and change this situation.
>>>>>
>>>>> We could then contrast that perezhivanie with the one many of as have,
>>>>>
>>>> in
>>>
>>>> which the situation is experience as a real TRAGEDY. I think in the
>>>>>
>>>> first
>>>
>>>> case, there is no hope for change, there is contempt; in the second,
>>>>> hearing those words as hollowed and hollowing require that you live the
>>>>> situation as a doubled situation in which you experienced it from a
>>>>> very
>>>>> different developmental stage. One in which the speech sounds as a case
>>>>>
>>>> of
>>>
>>>> involution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we find the transcribed speech and perform such analysis?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Going now to support the Woman's march here in Victoria BC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alfredo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
>>>> Assistant Professor
>>>> Department of Anthropology
>>>> 880 Spencer W. Kimball Tower
>>>> Brigham Young University
>>>> Provo, UT 84602
>>>> http://byu.academia.edu/GregoryThompson
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Anthropology
880 Spencer W. Kimball Tower
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
http://byu.academia.edu/GregoryThompson