[Xmca-l] Re: Bannon's actions as "shock event"

Sat Feb 4 11:55:57 PST 2017

Richard and Alfredo

I keep coming back to the question of how we, as academics, located in the
system of higher education, researchers on the social creation of social
inequality, ought to be re-orienting our research in light of the
re-surrection of global nationalist/populism.

So for me, its important to focus on concrete exemplars that might unloose
this potential: "shock events' possibility not only for separating but for
actually offering opportunities to re-organize and unite priorly separated
forces."

In a recent discussion at LCHC, this topic came up in terms of how to
connect our research and our undergraduates to the life of the communities
whose children do not make it to the university. Such an effort requires
coordination of a variety of dis-articulated groups with a common concern
about socially and culturally marginalized, econonomically stressed,
communities.

The challenge of engaging successfully in such work and satisfying the
academic production requirements of their academic personnel committees
seems a major challenge.

Positive suggestions of how to meet this challenge would be warmly accepted.

mike

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Alfredo Jornet Gil <a.j.gil@iped.uio.no>
wrote:

> Thanks for sharing Richard, I had seen Richardson's analysis online. In
> fact the amount of analyses in the media that this crisis is generating is
> overwhelming, but also very encouraging and gives hopes towards
> Richardson's notes on shock events' possibility not only for separating but
> for actually offering opportunities to re-organize and unite priorly
> separated forces. I wonder, if Lincoln managed without the web and the
> i-phone, will it happen today?
>
> Alfredo
> ________________________________________
> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu <xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> on behalf of Richard Beach <rbeach@umn.edu>
> Sent: 03 February 2017 00:28
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: [Xmca-l]  Bannon's actions as "shock event"
>
> Here’s an interesting analysis of Bannon’s actions on banning immigrants
> that’s related to Bakhtin’s notion of “eventness” and Roth’s (2014)
> analysis of “events-in-the-making” associated with the experience of
> unfolding events with unpredictable consequences. We still don’t know what
> the fallout will be from attempts to implement this ban.
>
> >From Heather Richardson, professor of History at Boston College:
>
> "I don't like to talk about politics on Facebook-- political history is my
> job, after all, and you are my friends-- but there is an important
> non-partisan point to make today.
>
> What Bannon is doing, most dramatically with last night's ban on
> immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries-- is creating what is
> known as a "shock event."
>
> Such an event is unexpected and confusing and throws a society into chaos.
> People scramble to react to the event, usually along some fault line that
> those responsible for the event can widen by claiming that they alone know
> how to restore order.
>
> When opponents speak out, the authors of the shock event call them
> enemies. As society reels and tempers run high, those responsible for the
> shock event perform a sleight of hand to achieve their real goal, a goal
> they know to be hugely unpopular, but from which everyone has been
> distracted as they fight over the initial event. There is no longer
> concerted opposition to the real goal; opposition divides along the
> partisan lines established by the shock event.
>
> Last night's Executive Order has all the hallmarks of a shock event. It
> was not reviewed by any governmental agencies or lawyers before it was
> released, and counterterrorism experts insist they did not ask for it.
> People charged with enforcing it got no instructions about how to do so.
> Courts immediately have declared parts of it unconstitutional, but border
> police in some airports are refusing to stop enforcing it.
>
> Predictably, chaos has followed and tempers are hot.
>
> My point today is this: unless you are the person setting it up, it is in
> no one's interest to play the shock event game. It is designed explicitly
> to divide people who might otherwise come together so they cannot stand
> against something its authors think they won't like.
>
> I don't know what Bannon is up to-- although I have some guesses-- but
> because I know Bannon's ideas well, I am positive that there is not a
> single person whom I consider a friend on either side of the aisle-- and my
> friends range pretty widely-- who will benefit from whatever it is.
>
> If the shock event strategy works, though, many of you will blame each
> other, rather than Bannon, for the fallout. And the country will have been
> tricked into accepting their real goal.
>
> But because shock events destabilize a society, they can also be used
> positively. We do not have to respond along old fault lines. We could just
> as easily reorganize into a different pattern that threatens the people who
> sparked the event.
>
> A successful shock event depends on speed and chaos because it requires
> knee-jerk reactions so that people divide along established lines. This,
> for example, is how Confederate leaders railroaded the initial southern
> states out of the Union.
>
> If people realize they are being played, though, they can reach across old
> lines and reorganize to challenge the leaders who are pulling the strings.
> This was Lincoln's strategy when he joined together Whigs, Democrats,
> Free-Soilers, anti-Nebraska voters, and nativists into the new Republican
> Party to stand against the Slave Power.
>
> Five years before, such a coalition would have been unimaginable. Members
> of those groups agreed on very little other than that they wanted all
> Americans to have equal economic opportunity. Once they began to work
> together to promote a fair economic system, though, they found much common
> ground. They ended up rededicating the nation to a "government of the
> people, by the people, and for the people."
>
> Confederate leaders and Lincoln both knew about the political potential of
> a shock event. As we are in the midst of one, it seems worth noting that
> Lincoln seemed to have the better idea about how to use it."
>
>
>
> Richard Beach, Professor Emeritus of English Education, University of
> Minnesota
> rbeach@umn.edu
> Websites: Digital writing <http://digitalwriting.pbworks.com/>, Media
> literacy <http://teachingmedialiteracy.pbworks.com/>, Teaching literature
> <http://teachingliterature.pbworks.com/>, Identity-focused ELA Teaching <
> http://identities.pbworks.com/>, Common Core State Standards <
> http://englishccss.pbworks.com/>, Apps for literacy learning <
> http://usingipads.pbworks.com/>, Teaching about climate change <
> http://climatechangeela.pbworks.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Helena Worthen <helenaworthen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On the subject of dividing, here is an ugly snapshot of the wedge
> getting driven in — the building trades unions finding common ground with
> Trump as a “developer.” The other deeply regressive unions are the prison
> guards and police.
> >
> > http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2017/01/building-trades-allow-
> themselves-to-be-played-like-fools
> >
> > I attend monthly discussion groups in the Bay Area organized around
> readings from the magazine Jacobin. I like these because the other
> participants are mostly 20s and early 30s, techies or grad students. Very
> smart, very alert, very well-read and articulate. They are stamped,
> however, with evidence of never having studied history. (Philosophy, yes —
> which is interesting.) To many of them, the building trades and police
> unions are typical of the political position of labor unions.
> >
> > So they see LIUNA leaders meeting with Trump and smear the whole labor
> movement with it.
> >
> > H
> >
> > Helena Worthen
> > helenaworthen@gmail.com
> > Berkeley, CA 94707
> > Blog about US and Viet Nam: helenaworthen.wordpress.com
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 26, 2017, at 9:26 AM, <lpscholar2@gmail.com> <
> lpscholar2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes,
> >> Today, the strategy of dividing, leaving us in disarray, is how i
> experience the deluge of draconian executive ‘orders’ that  leaves me
> spinning.
> >> Leaves me questioning where to start.
> >>
> >> Exposing the disarray on the other side in concrete ways (Koch vs
> Mercer) is a valuable addition to our ways of responding.
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
> >>
> >> From: Peg Griffin
> >> Sent: January 26, 2017 8:57 AM
> >> To: 'eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity'
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: The Cambridge Atlantica site that Peg referred to
> >>
> >> At this point, Larry, I'm content to rise to as much concrete as I can
> get near, until at least the late spring, to get at ideas and
> contradictions, to keep moving and supporting so I'm in enough places to
> and bits of the movement to find the productive places for me.
> >> A mini-mission of mine right now is to get people to recognize the
> divide among the big money folks in the US -- the Mercer father daughter
> beat the Koch brothers within the Republican moneyed.
> >> The other side works hard to divide us and take advantage of the
> disarray, so why not pay attention when they are dividing themselves!
> >> No use being a day late and a dollar short about who's who!
> >> Maybe it's just that my great uncle was in vaudeville and showed us
> three yammering nieces a super card game called "52 pick-up."  It's not too
> good too often for too long but everyone once in a while it's not a bad
> game.
> >> PG
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-l-bounces@
> mailman.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of lpscholar2@gmail.com
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 11:02 AM
> >> To: Peg Griffin; 'eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity'
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: The Cambridge Atlantica site that Peg referred to
> >>
> >> Peg, Mike,
> >> Reading these two articles on BigData and remembering how funding will
> be given to academic research that slots into being verified (or negated)
> through BigData is profoundly disturbing and leaves me with a sense of
> inertia at the scope of the alienation involved in this manipulation.
> >>
> >> Using Simmel’s back and forth notion of the relation of (distance and
> intimacy) and finding the proper ratio depending on the events  occuring
> then the proper relation between distance and intimacy will be shifting in
> scope in each historical era.
> >> Will our response to the vast distance incarnated through BIgData
> require intimate responses as counterpoint??
> >>
> >> If this is LIKE the 1930’s, do we have any answers from the past that
> give glimmers of a way forward that can be responsive at scale to the
> distancing of BigData?
> >>
> >> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
> >>
> >> From: Peg Griffin
> >> Sent: January 25, 2017 5:39 PM
> >> To: 'eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity'
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: The Cambridge Atlantica site that Peg referred to
> >>
> >> And here's  a Guardian story https://www.theguardian.com/
> us-news/2016/nov/23/donald-trump-cambridge-analytica-steve-bannon for
> those interested in the post-election ties among the Mercers (father and
> daughter), Bannon, Conway, and Cambridge Analytica.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-l-bounces@
> mailman.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Peg Griffin
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 7:43 PM
> >> To: 'eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity'
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: The Cambridge Atlantica site that Peg referred to
> >>
> >> Hee hee hee, Mike Cole, you rogue!  This is the official Cambridge
> Analytica site https://cambridgeanalytica.org/ But Mike direct you to a
> meatier sit about it!
> >> Peg
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-l-bounces@
> mailman.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of mike cole
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 1:41 PM
> >> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] The Cambridge Atlantica site that Peg referred to
> >>
> >> https://antidotezine.com/2017/01/22/trump-knows-you/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>