[Xmca-l] Re: Parts and wholes
lpscholar2@gmail.com
lpscholar2@gmail.com
Sat Sep 3 06:21:11 PDT 2016
Alfredo, I notice you referred to the “mental” in scare quotes. This reminds me of an earlier post where we explored the notion of the “mental” as an aspect of our “folk” psychology.
In the background I also hear David Kellogg moving from material problems of existential problems with flooding bridges, abstracting and going deeper, and then re/turning to the concrete.
Question?
Does the language of *parts and wholes* express this bi-directional movement adequately?
I also hear in the background Merleau-Panty's notion of developing “new organs of sense”.
The word “repetition* in relation to same/difference seems critical. To repeat the (identical) may be technology, mechanical, scientism, but something is lacking?
Reading the movement of *repetition* not as (identical) or the (same) but as bidirectional *back and forth* through questions and answers, and through regression to the known and anticipation of *something* new seems to be a particular notion of movement, moving towards developing *new organs of sense*?
In anticipation of discussing the meaning of perezhivanie it seems we may be *setting the table* for a lovely chat by opening a clearing
Possibly, could be.
Sent from my Windows 10 phone
From: Alfredo Jornet Gil
More information about the xmca-l
mailing list