[Xmca-l] Re: Why Doesn't Vygotsky Use "Microgenesis"?

[mike cole]

David and Larry --

Could you expand some more on the distinction between semantic meaning and
perceptual meaning?

I am having trouble seeing what you mean. :-)
mike

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 5:20 PM, <lpscholar2@gmail.com> wrote:

> David,
> So when we enter Zaza’s article (exploring prototyping and design
> methodology) we are entering semantic meaning as a way to rethink
> perception.
> Semantic meaning is linked to perceptual meaning but these types of
> meanings are distinct.
> Is this distinction you propose explicit in how Zaza is rethinking
> perception or are you extending or making explicit what you perceive as two
> different forms of meaning.
> Your post is intriguing and calls me into wanting to understand more
> clearly this distinction between semantic meaning (logo genesis) and
> perceptual meaning.
>
> My reason for my saying that I  paused when reading the first 2 paragraphs
> of the article as I felt myself being called into a new *space of reasons*
> that was unfamiliar and I was trying to get my bearings on rethinking
> perception.
> Your response turns us towards *meaning* and semantic ways of knowing and
> logo genesis.
> Leaves me a bit disoriented but fascinated to learn more.
>
> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>
> From: David Kellogg




-- 

It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
that creates history. Ernst Boesch