[Xmca-l] Re: MCA Issue 3 article for discussion Re-started

[White, Phillip]

John Stuart Mill notes the "empty husks" of education prevalent at the time (1836), that have come down through the ages.  here's his solutions:


https://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/jsmill/diss-disc/civilization/civilization.s06.html

CIVILIZATION Section 6, John Stuart Mill, Civilization<https://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/jsmill/diss-disc/civilization/civilization.s06.html>
www.laits.utexas.edu
Civilization John Stuart Mill Section 6 [Improving British education] These things must bide their time. But the other of the two great desiderata, the regeneration ...





dense, but illuminating one hundred and eighty years later.


phillip

________________________________
From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu <xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu> on behalf of Huw Lloyd <huw.softdesigns@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 5:02:34 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: MCA Issue 3 article for discussion Re-started

Thanks Andy.

On 25 November 2016 at 23:38, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:

> This is not a one-off event, Huw. I writing his PhD Dissertation on the
> philosophy of Nature of Democritus and Epicurus he was taking a position
> opposite to that of Hegel. The dissertation was published in 1841 when Marx
> was aged 22. He credits Feuerbach with the impulse to take a stronger
> materialist line against Hegel with the publication of the Essence of
> Christianity in 1841. His notes on Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843) show
> that he was trying to take a dismissive attitude to Hegel, and it is only
> in the Theses on Feuerbach and The German Ideology of 1845 where the
> outlines of Marx's distinctive critique of Hegel are clearly present, as
> David notes, in the form of a critique of Feuerbach. It is reasonable to
> suppose that he was working out this position at the time he wrote the 1844
> Manuscripts. However, he is still working on how to use Hegel as he writes
> his Political Economy material in 1857-58, after which his position is
> pretty settled. However, his turn to Hegel in 1881 to understand calculus,
> only 2 years before his death, demonstrate that this was an unfinished task.
>
> Andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Blunden
> http://home.mira.net/~andy
> http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making
> On 26/11/2016 2:58 AM, Huw Lloyd wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> Interesting too to consider Marx's mode of analysis, which pertains to
>> something I'm currently drafting.  Does anyone know when Marx specifically
>> studied and re-fashioned Hegel's dialectic?
>>
>> Best,
>> Huw
>>
>>
>>
>