[Xmca-l] Re: The Semiotic Stance.pdf

[Martin John Packer]

My take on this diagram, Greg, is that Tony wants to illustrate how in Peirce’s scheme the object is, so to speak, always 'over the horizon.’ I think we’re back here to appearance/reality: the sign is what appears, but it is taken as an appearance of an object that is not given directly.  

Martin



> On Jun 30, 2016, at 7:42 PM, Greg Thompson <greg.a.thompson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Tony's figure 7.3 makes me doubly anxious
> about this since it seems to suggest that the object and the representamen
> exist in different realms. I'm fine with that kind of dualism in a
> dualistic account, but it seems not quite right to have such a dualism as
> part of an account whose goal is non-dualism).