[Xmca-l] Re: The Semiotic Stance.pdf
Martin John Packer
mpacker@uniandes.edu.co
Fri Jul 1 11:11:10 PDT 2016
Affirmative.
Except, as you know Mike, this projection that is interpretation isn’t a force, it’s an act (in the non-technical sense); an aspect of a project (Andy will be happy to hear).
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 12:58 PM, mike cole <mcole@ucsd.edu> wrote:
>
> Ooops, the projectile *force *might be called imagination?
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:57 AM, mike cole <mcole@ucsd.edu> wrote:
>
>> The projectile for might be called imagination?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Martin John Packer <
>> mpacker@uniandes.edu.co> wrote:
>>
>>> Right, Andy: the word ‘object’ is a sign whose object is itself over the
>>> horizon, projected there by writers and readers alike as they interpret the
>>> sign.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jun 30, 2016, at 8:52 PM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> :) It is impossible to argue with what you say, Martin, without using
>>> the word (i.e. sign) "object" in the belioef that the reader will
>>> understand what is being referenced!
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Andy Blunden
>>>> http://home.mira.net/~andy
>>>> http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making
>>>> On 1/07/2016 11:14 AM, Martin John Packer wrote:
>>>>> My take on this diagram, Greg, is that Tony wants to illustrate how in
>>> Peirce’s scheme the object is, so to speak, always 'over the horizon.’ I
>>> think we’re back here to appearance/reality: the sign is what appears, but
>>> it is taken as an appearance of an object that is not given directly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jun 30, 2016, at 7:42 PM, Greg Thompson <greg.a.thompson@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tony's figure 7.3 makes me doubly anxious
>>>>>> about this since it seems to suggest that the object and the
>>> representamen
>>>>>> exist in different realms. I'm fine with that kind of dualism in a
>>>>>> dualistic account, but it seems not quite right to have such a
>>> dualism as
>>>>>> part of an account whose goal is non-dualism).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
>> that creates history. Ernst Boesch
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
> that creates history. Ernst Boesch
More information about the xmca-l
mailing list