[Xmca-l] Re: Question on an abstract notion

[Andy Blunden]

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/stewart.htm
This is the Introduction to "Hegel Myths and Legends."
Unfortunately, Stewart propagates a couple of Marx myths and 
legends in the process of compiling a passably good expose 
of Hegel myths and legends.
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden
http://home.mira.net/~andy
http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making 

On 25/04/2016 1:54 AM, Lplarry wrote:
>
> Andy,
>
> Is there no merit then in this notion of abstraction as a 
> moment that may potentially become concretely actualized 
> or realized ?
>
> Andy  is there an article that can unfold how this myth 
> historically developed?
>
> My growing edge.
>
> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>
> *From: *Andy Blunden <mailto:ablunden@mira.net>
> *Sent: *April 24, 2016 8:31 AM
> *To: *xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu <mailto:xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
> *Subject: *[Xmca-l] Re: Question on an abstract notion
>
> That Hegel used "Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis" is a myth, 
> Larry.
>
> Andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Andy Blunden
>
> http://home.mira.net/~andy
>
> http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making 
>
>
> On 25/04/2016 1:06 AM, Lplarry wrote:
>
> > Hegel begins with a high abstraction as a thesis 
> statement. Then moves to antithesis, arriving at a more 
> *concrete* synthesis. This as the movement towards form 
> and structure and order.
>
> >
>
> > If this is accurate then I want to begin here with a 
> high abstraction.
>
> >
>
> > Being is not self-identity but rather 
> self-differentiation. The opposite of being (thesis) is 
> not non-being or negation, but rather the *absence* of 
> negation (uniformity or indifference).
>
> >
>
> > I will pause here, at this height of high abstraction as 
> a speculation without grounding. Does this abstraction 
> have any merit?
>
> > If this notion/speculation as high abstraction does have 
> any potency, this abstraction will need to *travel* 
> towards  *concrete* actualization and realization as a 
> movement of *becoming* (movement of synthesis).
>
> >
>
> > First my inquiry  concerning this high abstracted 
> question exploring  the notion of being &*absence* of 
> being (uniformity) as *indifference*.
>
> > Living experience (as) asymmetrical (not symmetrical 
> uniformity).
>
> > Therefore the need for *modulation* within living 
> experience.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>
> >
>
> >
>