[Xmca-l] Re: Polls are Open

[rjsp2]

I knew that I was jumping to conclusions on the basis of one word, and
I'm quite sure it was tua non culpa, Mike; I shall have to read it now,
but my impression is that there is more than a little work on the skill
and art of medical diagnosis, and a continuing and healthy debate about
how it can be taught to would be doctors.

Rob


On 28/02/2015 16:23, mike cole wrote:
> Perhaps, Rob, like many contributors to this list and the journal, the
> authors are not native speakers of English and the editors and copy editors
> who worked on the ms thought that the abstract made it was clear that this
> was a paper about decision making. Residual misunderstandings are the
> editors' responsibility of course. Mea 1/4 culpa.
>
> I believe all the articles are worth discussion. Voting is the easy part,
> discussion a little more time consuming!  :-)
> mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:01 AM, rjsp2 <r.j.s.parsons@open.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> I considered that, but it seems an odd way to put it.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28/02/2015 14:37, mike cole wrote:
>>
>>> Rob-- Perhaps the the author meant understudied by social scientists of
>>> the
>>> type
>>> who publish in MCA?
>>> mike
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 2:03 AM, rjsp2 <r.j.s.parsons@open.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>   I won't say which one I voted for, but I didn't vote for the oncology
>>>> one - I couldn't get past the authors' description of it as an
>>>> understudied field. Oncology? Really?
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28/02/2015 04:25, HENRY SHONERD wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Mike,
>>>>> Thank you. I thought this would be tedious, but then: abstracts, not
>>>>> full
>>>>> articles! Then it got game-like. That of course is your intention.
>>>>> Anyway
>>>>> it all looks like expansion and third spaces. Fractally speaking. I did
>>>>> vote for the Dakota incident but all four of them look interesting.
>>>>> Free!
>>>>> Henry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    On Feb 27, 2015, at 1:35 PM, mike cole <mcole@ucsd.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The polls are now open for the first number of MCA for 2015. Check the
>>>>>> abstracts and see what you would like to discuss. The winner
>>>>>> is made available free at the publishers. We'll arrange for that in a
>>>>>> week
>>>>>> or so when people have had a chance to check out the
>>>>>> abstracts and to make a choice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Click here  http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Journal/poll.html  and vote as
>>>>>> often
>>>>>> as you can.  :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an
>>>>>> object
>>>>>> that creates history. Ernst Boesch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>   -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>>>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland
>>>> (SC
>>>> 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial
>>>> Conduct Authority.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>> 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial
>> Conduct Authority.
>>
>>
>

-- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.