[Xmca-l] Re: Polls are Open

[mike cole]

Perhaps, Rob, like many contributors to this list and the journal, the
authors are not native speakers of English and the editors and copy editors
who worked on the ms thought that the abstract made it was clear that this
was a paper about decision making. Residual misunderstandings are the
editors' responsibility of course. Mea 1/4 culpa.

I believe all the articles are worth discussion. Voting is the easy part,
discussion a little more time consuming!  :-)
mike






On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:01 AM, rjsp2 <r.j.s.parsons@open.ac.uk> wrote:

> I considered that, but it seems an odd way to put it.
>
>
>
> On 28/02/2015 14:37, mike cole wrote:
>
>> Rob-- Perhaps the the author meant understudied by social scientists of
>> the
>> type
>> who publish in MCA?
>> mike
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 2:03 AM, rjsp2 <r.j.s.parsons@open.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>  I won't say which one I voted for, but I didn't vote for the oncology
>>> one - I couldn't get past the authors' description of it as an
>>> understudied field. Oncology? Really?
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28/02/2015 04:25, HENRY SHONERD wrote:
>>>
>>>  Mike,
>>>> Thank you. I thought this would be tedious, but then: abstracts, not
>>>> full
>>>> articles! Then it got game-like. That of course is your intention.
>>>> Anyway
>>>> it all looks like expansion and third spaces. Fractally speaking. I did
>>>> vote for the Dakota incident but all four of them look interesting.
>>>> Free!
>>>> Henry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   On Feb 27, 2015, at 1:35 PM, mike cole <mcole@ucsd.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>>>
>>>>> The polls are now open for the first number of MCA for 2015. Check the
>>>>> abstracts and see what you would like to discuss. The winner
>>>>> is made available free at the publishers. We'll arrange for that in a
>>>>> week
>>>>> or so when people have had a chance to check out the
>>>>> abstracts and to make a choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Click here  http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Journal/poll.html  and vote as
>>>>> often
>>>>> as you can.  :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an
>>>>> object
>>>>> that creates history. Ernst Boesch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland
>>> (SC
>>> 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial
>>> Conduct Authority.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
> 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial
> Conduct Authority.
>
>


-- 
It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
that creates history. Ernst Boesch.