[Xmca-l] Re: in the eye of the beholder

[mike cole]

It's the first message that is new. The second has been an unaccepted
criticism for at least half a century.
Both are right!

Mike

On Sunday, September 21, 2014, Martin John Packer <mpacker@uniandes.edu.co>
wrote:

> So there are two distinct problems here: First, the researchers are not
> diverse. Second, the people they (we?) study are not diverse.
>
> Martin
>
> On Sep 21, 2014, at 8:11 PM, David Preiss <daviddpreiss@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Loved the WEIRD acronym. One of the best ironies I've seen in recent
> scientific writing.
> >
> > Enviado desde mi iPhone
> >
> >> El 21-09-2014, a las 18:57, Rod Parker-Rees <
> R.Parker-Rees@plymouth.ac.uk <javascript:;>> escribió:
> >>
> >> Great article, David - highlights the importance (at every level) of
> being aware of what others might find odd about us (secondary
> socialisation?).
> >>
> >> Rod
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu <javascript:;> [mailto:
> xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of David Preiss
> >> Sent: 21 September 2014 18:31
> >> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> >> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: in the eye of the beholder
> >>
> >> This article is revelant for this topic:
> http://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~henrich/pdfs/WeirdPeople.pdf
> >>
> >> Enviado desde mi iPhone
> >>
> >>> El 21-09-2014, a las 13:42, mike cole <mcole@ucsd.edu <javascript:;>>
> escribió:
> >>>
> >>> The book by Medin and Bang, "Who's asking" published by MIT is GREAT
> >>> reading. Seeing this in Scientific American is super.
> >>>
> >>> mike
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:18 AM, David Preiss <daviddpreiss@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> What a fantastic piece Peter! Loved the references to primatology.
> >>>> David
> >>>>
> >>>> Enviado desde mi iPhone
> >>>>
> >>>>> El 21-09-2014, a las 7:31, Peter Smagorinsky <smago@uga.edu
> <javascript:;>> escribió:
> >>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/point-of-view-affects-how-s
> >>>> cience-is-done/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Development and Evolution are both ... "processes of construction and
> >>> re- construction in which heterogeneous resources are contingently but
> >>> more or less reliably reassembled for each life cycle." [Oyama,
> >>> Griffiths, and Gray, 2001]
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]<
> http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass>
> >>
> >> This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely
> for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the
> information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it.
> If you have received this email in error please let the sender know
> immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not
> necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts
> no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails
> and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility
> for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its
> attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied
> by an official order form.
> >>
> >
>
>
>

-- 

Development and Evolution are both ... "processes of construction and re-
construction in which heterogeneous resources are contingently but more or
less reliably reassembled for each life cycle." [Oyama, Griffiths, and
Gray, 2001]