[Xmca-l] Re: Messages on XMCA

[Andy Blunden]

My strength is in the fundamentals. So I would start with the 
fundamentals (action, artefact, consciousness,...) which don't need to 
refer to the higher level concepts (like zoped, learning, ...), where 
others would do better. I am thinking in terms of a collaborative 
effort, of course.

Andy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Andy Blunden*
http://home.mira.net/~andy/


Helen Grimmett wrote:
> The trouble is always working out where to start. Which term do you discuss
> first without having explained any of the terms you need to explain the
> first one?! A wiki with lots of hyperlinks possibly makes this a lot
> easier. I take it you were being facetious when you called this simple?  :)
>
> Helen
>
>
> Dr Helen Grimmett
> Lecturer, Student Adviser,
> Faculty of Education,
> Building 902, Room 159
> Monash University, Berwick campus
> Phone: 9904 7171
>
>
>
>
> On 4 October 2013 09:17, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Go for it, Andy
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thursday, October 3, 2013, Andy Blunden wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> I'd be interested in collaborating in constructing a Wiki section on CHAT
>>> terms, Mike. And I would add to your list:
>>> Action, Behaviour, Artefact, Mediation, Activity, Situation (apart from
>>> SSD), Consciousness, Matter and Concept.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ------------
>>> *Andy Blunden*
>>> http://home.mira.net/~andy/
>>>
>>>
>>> mike cole wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Bruce is asking about absence of email on xmca. I have sent a couple of
>>>> message, but of course do not
>>>> see them except later on the accumulated list.
>>>>
>>>> What's new? There sure are a lot of you out there. Hit  reply and say
>>>> something about what you
>>>> are working on or wondering about.
>>>>
>>>> For example, I have been fussing over vocabulary confusions in a course
>>>> that I visit in Colorado taught by
>>>> Kris G.  Learning, development, practice, zoped, social situation of
>>>> development, context...... how are they related in Vygotky's theory??
>>>> Simple
>>>> questions like that.
>>>>
>>>> And you??
>>>> mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>
>
>