[Xmca-l] meaning and sense

[Andy Blunden]

I was just looking into this business about Vygotsky imputing excessive 
stablility to word meaning. The following key passage from Chapter 7 of 
"Thinking and Speech" does not, it appers to me, to imply such stability:

    "First, in inner speech, we find a predominance of the word’s sense
    over its meaning. Paulhan significantly advanced the psychological
    analysis of speech by introducing the distinction between a word’s
    sense and meaning. A word’s sense is the aggregate of all the
    psychological facts that arise in our consciousness as a result of
    the word. Sense is a dynamic, fluid, and complex formation which has
    several zones that vary in their stability. Meaning is only one of
    these zones of the sense that the word acquires in the context of
    speech. It is the most stable, unified, and precise of these zones.
    In different contexts, a word’s sense changes. In contrast, meaning
    is a comparatively fixed and stable point, one that remains constant
    with all the changes of the word’s sense that are associated with
    its use in various contexts. Change in the word’s sense is a basic
    factor in the semantic analysis of speech. The actual meaning of the
    word is inconstant. In one operation, the word emerges with one
    meaning; in another, another is acquired. The dynamic nature of
    meaning leads us to Paulhan’s problem, to the problem of the
    relationship between meaning and sense. Isolated in the lexicon, the
    word has only one meaning. However, this meaning is nothing more
    than a potential that can only be realized in living speech, and in
    living speech meaning is only a cornerstone in the edifice of sense."

As I read this, the stability of meaning is merely relative to that of 
sense, i.e., in the context of speech, rather than "teh aggregate of all 
psychological facts." He is not at all denying the fact of polysemy or 
the cultural and historical migration of meaning.

Andy
mike cole wrote:
> I agree, very clearly statements of the sense/meaning relation, along with
> the Mandelshtam line, " I forgot the thought I wanted to say, and thought,
> unembodied, returned to the hall of shadows."
>
> In the quote here, I think LSV is somewhat overstating the stability of
> meaning across contexts; yes relative to the microgenetic processes of
> sense making capturable with
> modern technologies, but not totally "context independent." Even dictionary
> meanings change, as LSV was well aware from his interest in the history of
> words in relation to their appearance in children's vocabularies in
> ontogeny.
>
> Keeping the simultaneous relevance of several time scales in mind in these
> discussions seems really important, as hard as it is to do.
> mike
>
>
>