[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Current takes on the 'later' Vygotsky
- To: Alfredo Jornet Gil <email@example.com>, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Current takes on the 'later' Vygotsky
- From: <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 05:36:36 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:mime-version:to:from:subject:date:importance :thread-topic:in-reply-to:references; bh=JD1CJdB1A0plc4wgxKCnFglvcH6zRQu9u7nd02NbiYY=; b=tr7xRjBgi75BbcYsW9XNqArH8EpHrq1eJ08zmvc7+B+H4OF/p0nUPgXU8p2KSNJZ5o UGTm8mjs7TiBhctnMMalgYG1wfGLjb5atJGtllxIJX75SGshmSw0+KwIyPXRPEmeyZP9 W4HYRctJXOK4iuOQH2eQ4o4Rsv6skvmpEYVGzbfuIfZfielZcojuJpCwmjPUXawBBaO/ kFnv9Y4/t4ZEMAIwP6AB8aj/mxc4PfJbGlObyGCxfhfyZ9kA7xjdXPzT2jYS1t3Ojzlj vGacXUtQOyRllNAf8eq9MafCFiGlrorqrd+wA9AK2pZkm/ZHMNA5raW6uEUllfTOteq6 KciA==
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <F625D459-3C8B-435C-806B-DD9F69C02255@roadrunner.com> <email@example.com> <CAHCnM0DU05DuRuR8UQ=VQybz0ku-xQ3GxrdifsMO9V6YmUt82w@mail.gmail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <MWHPR08MB2861BB2E0FEFA384F6929C0FA70F0@MWHPR08MB2861.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>, <8029C164-2A9F-4CAA-B0EF-7799A55E7194@gmail.com> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Thread-topic: Current takes on the 'later' Vygotsky
I offer a quote from the ‘later’ Vygotsky that you cite in your article that may prime the pump:
Language is NOT the relation between a sound and a denoted thing. It is the relation between the speaker and the listener, the relation between people directed toward an object. IT IS THE INTERPSYCHIC REACTION THAT ESTABLISHES THE UNITY OF TWO ORAGANISMS IN THE SAME ORIENTATION, Toward an object
The focus hear on ‘establishing the UNITY’ of teacher and student IN their orientation.
The IN includes (within)
Sent from my Windows 10 phone
Sent: April 9, 2017 5:21 AM
To: Alfredo Jornet Gil; eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: RE: [Xmca-l] Current takes on the 'later' Vygotsky
I have been slowly reading (and digesting) your and Wolff-Michael’s article (Theorizing – with/out mediators) that joins the current ‘takes’ on the later Vygotsky.
My impression (and appreciation) of this emerging tradition is significant as an enlarging of the scope and ‘re-working’ of the Vygotsky who was known in the process of moving into the West European and North Atlantic form of theorizing.
I am reading your article in relation to the notion of ‘playworlds’ and ‘spielraum’ (translated playrooms).
A key re-working of (mediation) has to do with re/thinking triangle diagrams as static (with mediation at the apex).
This generates a PREsumption of two variables at the base of the triangle assumed as (elements, essences, things) that inter/act through an ‘intermediary’ third (element, essence, thing).
Your article indicates this is the classical or canonical version of (mediation) as the third thing/element through which the other two things/elements become changed or develop.
Your re-working of (mediation) adds the temporal, duration, and (unit of analysis) and implies it is not the elements or parts that each individually change or develop (classic intermediary model of elements transformed by going through a third element IN a triangle with an apex mediator)
There are only relation of (within UNITS).
When a tool, technique, sign, word, artifact) develops then the ENTIRE UNIT (not elements) develops.
Alfredo, I personally believe your approach (currently re-working classical and Western canonical versions) deserves to have its own (place) as a subsection on the XMCA site. To become more clear on this ‘later’ Vygotsky.
Then a conversation may generate that puts in question this re-working
In a spirit of ‘play’ in rooms.
A movement back and forth, oscillating, spiralling, developing, and never reaching a determinate conclusion, once and forever.
Putting in play triangles with mediators at the apex as static diagrams.
More open, fluid, theorizing with ANDA WITHOUT ‘mediators’ as we play with these notions.
I recommend others read the article ‘Theorizing with/out mediators’.
Reading the (/) to mean interval where we tarry awhile in a spirit of re-working theorizing with/out mediators.
I believe we need to create a subsection on XMCA to let these notions percolate and permeate the more classical boundary markers.
My way of saying your article is a pro-found re-working of the notions of (within) and (without) and (mediation) at the core of this re-working PRE-assumptions.
My morning muse
Sent from my Windows 10 phone
From: Alfredo Jornet Gil
Sent: April 8, 2017 10:20 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] Current takes on the 'later' Vygotsky
yes, things have been a little quiet lately, but there have been few threads going on, perhaps most importantly the one discussing Jang's (this issue's) paper on multi-ethnic issues on Second Language.
Other threads have seemed to resonate on recent articles/works attempting to re-work (or work further) some of Vygotsky's key concepts, in particular ZPD and Mediation (with a couple of articles having been circulated).
Connecting to the latter, it seems that several of those efforts are making emphasis on Vygotsky's later period, suggesting that much of the prior and current uptakes have focused almost exclusively on the instrumental aspects that were more salient in his middle period, and not so much on the lines of inquiry that the psychologist was opening never had the chance to pursue.
I attach yet another such work, this time by del Río and Álvarez. Much is being written about how and to what extent Vygotsky was revising his own prior work. This one tells as more about that, and does so both in English and in Spanish.
I wonder how do xmca'ers (who likely are busy reading world news as things are getting more and more perplexing) feel and think about this tendency/prospect in cultural-historical theory literature.
From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> on behalf of Helena Worthen <email@example.com>
Sent: 09 April 2017 03:11
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Playworlds, Performance, Perezhivanie, Apophasis ... and TRUMP'S speech!
Hi, Esteban -
Things have been a little quiet recently. I suspect my co-xmca-ers in the US are either mid-semester or digging in on big projects that will have some significance, hopefully, given what we’re dealing with here.
You may or may not be aware that our new Secretary of Education is the sister of Erik Prince, http://www.ibtimes.com/who-betsy-devos-brother-erik-princes-involvement-blackwater-chinese-money-laundering-2493834
Just a hint of what is happening to education, top to bottom, in the US.
Berkeley, CA 94707
Blog about US and Viet Nam: helenaworthen.wordpress.com
> On Apr 8, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Stephen Diaz <EDiaz@csusb.edu> wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> Don't know if you are still the one for xmcc but I am not getting any emails from that list serve. Can you please check on that. I still want to continue on it if possible. Thanks.
> Esteban Diaz
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> on behalf of Bruce Jones <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 3:23 PM
> To: mike cole; Andy Blunden; eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Playworlds, Performance, Perezhivanie, Apophasis ... and TRUMP'S speech!
> On 2/5/17 2:39 PM, mike cole wrote:
>> Bruce's email is not bouncing from san diego.
>> Perhaps there is only one c in unsubscribe?
> Spelling mistakes will not cause bounces. I do the unsubscribes by hand
> in order to make sure they are removed from the database.
> Bruce Jones
> Sys Admin, LCHC