[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Solids and Liquids/Entities and dynamic flows
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Solids and Liquids/Entities and dynamic flows
- From: peter jones <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 21:59:14 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1470520755; bh=HQ/hPDWghm0eVOliHNhVfW9yKH1sIh+PY8gUcWHKJmk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=nrUTFLTuPb54m1pIRZPn5QR/1cGsJ6ClbxncikyIJtQ8k8tU6IAd8vM128r8+8SirbeolsFpDMPKKTvxLfEfb4NGFb7IOVogmhTBjIMA1ZcrdznlAd9qOTEjLenv1sQa/H2K6gv10upRy4e4sXr3WnqUNAPPCN8Fv1C3XWQ6uWP0XZBC6Zmga6ph385esmBGr8rs+yeDa4u5sPGOIeSw1Cg+tGzg7cYecA8b4fi2JTOcO2hXWBWPUqF3SLU6Zm6d4djbRtW7yovT/hvKB5IGxX8Wr1VVe5V/NyjANAyaBv9Ojqqai/2atPBdbcijj81Kv+f2e176XIu4zwzkdCaBGg==
- In-reply-to: <85887F38-BB08-4D83-9F8B-96C9E9858F21@gmail.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CAHCnM0D4wedx3d+ZgK5nEVbH2EvxrrMUAkndOc9=xPpkOc_8kw@mail.gmail.com> <85887F38-BB08-4D83-9F8B-96C9E9858F21@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: peter jones <email@example.com>, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: <email@example.com>
Surfaces - solid, liquid, virtual?
Avrum Stroll - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| | | | | |
| Avrum Stroll - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaAvrum Stroll (February 15, 1921 – September 12, 2013) was a research professor at the University of California, San Diego. Born in Oakland, California, he was a distinguished philosopher and a noted scholar in the fields of epistemology, philosophy of language, and twentieth... |
| View on en.wikipedia.org | Preview by Yahoo |
Culture as a SUR-FACE - INTER-FACE verbal communication/other
Cognitive - reflective - reflexive
- with properties that may or may not resonate, flow (water - glass - rock...), sense (Flatland - reduced, capture, re-cord-er), collaborate (folded, pinched).
Culture crystallized through art - several surfaces.
Culture cut by technology, excised by censorship.
Surfaces - extended - hypercube.
Culture as a surface rend through revolution - rend for innovation / creativity
Same surface different place.
Would still refer to Serres on flows - change - choices.... Thanks Henry - all.
Peter JonesCommunity Mental Health NurseCMHT BrooksideAughton StreetOrmskirk L39 3BH, UK+44 01772 773770& Graduate Student - Lancaster University: Technology Enhanced LearningBlogging at "Welcome to the QUAD"http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/http://twitter.com/h2cm
From: HENRY SHONERD <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
Sent: Saturday, 6 August 2016, 2:32
Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Solids and Liquids/Entities and dynamic flows
I could say
Would that be essentializing? Not a bad rap though.:)
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 6:20 PM, mike cole <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I stumbled over an article on the "the psychological foundations of
> culture" with a summary/discussion article by Adams and Markus. (ref
> below). The authors contrast two prominent definitions/theories of culture
> prominent in the literature on the relationship between culture and human
> psychological processes. The characterization struck me forcefully as an
> example of Bauman's solid-liquid distinction in a different discourse
> stream, providing food for thought on the topic of mind, culture, and
> One approach is closely related to developmental approaches such as my own,
> Barbara Rogoff, Patricia Greenfield, Mike Tomasello). It traces its origins
> to ploughshares and agriculture, the process of making things grow,
> nurturing. a process transpiring over time. The other (Social Psychology)
> adopts "the customary beliefs, social forms, of a racial, religious, or
> social group."
> The first, developmental approach is said to view "culture as dynamic
> process or flowing medium" while the second, social psychology view is
> described as an "entity conception of culture." The entity conception
> "implies a conception of culture as a relatively 'fixed' system of
> "customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits." It also associates
> this system with readily identifiable 'racial, religious, or social group."
> The authors then list "several undesireable consequences" of adopting the
> entity point of view. I found these very interesting. I will just list
> them. If there is sufficient interest I can get a scan of the chapter made.
> There is, unfortunately, no similar list for the liquid, developmental,
> perspective. Liquids, Bauman remind us can spill and spoil the rug and need
> to be contained. They flow, to be sure, but that flow is constrained by a
> The authors adopt a view they call "culture as patterns."
> The juxtaposition of these readings and the ongoing discussion of the 11 ox
> paintings has induced me to think again about long standing ideas. Always
> enlightening. Thanks.
> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
> that creates history. Ernst Boesch