Punctuated evolution exactly Andy, a theory promoted by Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldridge. Actually I think they called it punctuated equilibrium because they wanted to differentiate it from Ernst Mayr. There's also something similar in physics I think - called something like ubiquitous information and the idea that a number of seemingly random physical events come together at a specific time to cause a complete change, different from chaos theory I think (probably way off her) because they are not talking about the development of actual systems but the interrelationships of pieces of information leading to a cause of, well, revolutionary change. Philosophy of science, biological/geological theory, physics, I wonder where else this idea is floating around. And I wonder if it can be applied to human development. Michael ________________________________ From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu on behalf of Andy Blunden Sent: Mon 6/20/2011 10:33 AM To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity Subject: Re: [xmca] Units of Scientiic Achievement But the metaphor Michael is calling on, Carol, as I see it is "normal science" is the incremental, gradual adaptation of a species to its niche, and remaining much the same for millions of years, and on the other hand, when a species is under real pressure, you get exactly the process Kuhn describes in science: rapid diversification and die-outs, with a distinctly new species species emerging at the end. It's called "punctuated evolutuion" isn't it? I find the idea of a formation perfecting itself into extinction attractive. As to "Intelligent design" - this has nothing to do with proof or disproof, Carol, but Faith. Andy Carol Macdonald wrote: > Yep, evolutionery theory actually runs counter to "normal" science, but what > would it take to *disprove* it? I can't imagine. Intelligent design has > something of the same problem--you would have to disprove the existence of > God in order to disprove it. > Carol > > On 20 June 2011 15:43, Michael Glassman <MGlassman@ehe.osu.edu> wrote: > > >> I think Kuhn's idea of revolution as defining movement between paradigms >> comes not from speed but from the idea that change is not adaptive nor >> necessarily progressive, but is instead based on the failure of the dominant >> paradigm to solve crucial problems (hence problem solving at the unit of >> analysis). As a matter of fact my reading is that within Kuhn's framework >> of change the idea of evolution actually works against change. This is >> because those who are most wedded to the paradigm will continuously make the >> argument that the paradigm itself is evolving and should not be abandoned. >> They will always make the argument just one more experiment, just one more >> twist or turn to the theory and the paradigm is right back on course. >> Change though means a complete break, a giving up on the idea that a >> paradigm can actually adapt, and there is a revolution in thinking. >> >> Michael >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu on behalf of Andy Blunden >> Sent: Mon 6/20/2011 9:33 AM >> To: Carol Macdonald >> Cc: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity >> Subject: Re: [xmca] Units of Scientiic Achievement >> >> >> Well, the literature on that book would probably fill a library so I ought >> to limit myself. >> >> I don't know where the idea of "no revolutions" comes from, but I would >> have thought that the idea that the dominant paradigm being gradually eroded >> in the very process of working itself out is pretty suggestive. Maybe the >> fall of Apartheid didn't live up to the image of a revolution either? >> Anyway, I think there are a lot of parallels with both Vygotsky and Hegel, >> so long as one remains within the confines of a closed scientific community. >> The main thing I was struck by was Kuhn's notion of concepts as problem >> solution. >> >> Vygotsky said it many times, but for example from "The development of >> thinking and concept formation in the adolescent" in the Vygotsky Reader: >> "only during the course of some intelligent activity directed toward the >> attainment of a specific goal or the solution of a particular problem, can a >> concept come into being and take form." Or this paragraph: >> >> >> >> "In contrast to the process of maturation of instincts and inborn >> drives, the impelling force which determines the start of any process or >> initiates any evolving mechanism of behaviour and propels it forward along >> the path of further development, is not to be found inside, but outside the >> adolescent and, in this sense, the problems thrown up in front of the >> maturing adolescent by the society around him, which are connected with the >> process of growing into the cultural, professional and social life of >> adults, are extremely important functional aspects which continually depend >> on the reciprocal conditionality and the organic coherence and internal >> unity of form and content in the development of thinking." >> >> When you say "the cell concept of the concept is there all the time," I >> presume you mean the paradigm which is generating the problem-solving >> activity? Yes, until it falls into crisis. So you have an ideal, which first >> arose as a solution to a total crisis, and then sets up a new project to >> establish itself and solve its own problems. And thus all the subordinate >> concepts, its "special principles" (to use Hegel's phrase) appear in the >> form of problems needing to be solved. But the solution or not of every >> problem ricochets back on the "cell" as you call it. >> >> Does that make sense? >> Andy >> >> Carol Macdonald wrote: >> >> It's me, who never has the reference to hand, but apparently, there >> aren't actual revolutions, the dominant paradigm gets gets eroded and >> eroded over time. >> >> And yes, I can see the unit as the developed concept--but aren't we >> going to have to describe what happens as this thing is developing? So I >> don't think it is totally compelling. Of course I may be missing something, >> and the cell concept of the concept is there all the time? What do you >> think, Andy? >> >> Carol >> >> >> >> >> On 20 June 2011 12:11, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote: >> >> >> I have just re-read Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific >> Revolutions" after many years. As is often the case with a classic like >> this, it proved to be a lot more nuanced than its reception (or my memory of >> it). >> One of the lines which struck me was this: "the unit of >> scientific achievement is the solved problem." (p. 169) >> In the context of Vygotsky's writing on true concepts and >> the meaning he gives to "unit" this is very profound. Reading Kuhn from >> Vygotsky I find very productive. >> >> Andy >> -- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *Andy Blunden* >> Joint Editor MCA: >> http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=g932564744 >> Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ >> Book: http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857 >> MIA: http://www.marxists.org <http://www.marxists.org/> <http://www.marxists.org/> >> >> __________________________________________ >> _____ >> xmca mailing list >> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu >> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Visiting Lecturer >> Wits School of Education >> Research Fellow >> Linguistics Dept: Unisa >> ----------------------------------------- >> HOME (please use these details) >> 6 Andover Road >> Westdene >> Johannesburg 2092 >> +27 (0)11 673 9265 +27 (0)82 562 1050 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ________________________________ >> >> *Andy Blunden* >> Joint Editor MCA: >> http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=g932564744 >> Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ >> Book: http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857 >> MIA: http://www.marxists.org <http://www.marxists.org/> <http://www.marxists.org/> >> >> >> __________________________________________ >> _____ >> xmca mailing list >> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu >> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca >> >> >> > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Andy Blunden* Joint Editor MCA: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=g932564744 Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ Book: http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857 MIA: http://www.marxists.org <http://www.marxists.org/> __________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
<<winmail.dat>>
__________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca