[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Dialects of Development- Sameroff



Hello Martin:

I like the concept but am wondering why you chose biological evolution and 
not phylogenesis?

eric




Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu>
Sent by: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
03/14/2010 12:20 PM
Please respond to "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity"

 
        To:     "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [xmca] Dialects of Development- Sameroff



On Mar 14, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Larry Purss wrote:

> 
> What do others think of the double helix (and/or the other visual images 
in the article). How central is the double helix (either as an "is Like" 
or "IS" objectification) to your notions of the human sciences?
> Larry
> 
...and I am pretty sure I stole, I mean appropriated, this from someone; 
I've forgotten who...

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca


Attachment: PastedGraphic-2.pdf
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca