[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xmca] zpd additional comment
Umen, Lois!
Michael G. Levykh, Ph.D.
-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
Behalf Of Lois Holzman
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 7:04 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: Re: [xmca] zpd additional comment
Amen, Michael!
Lois Holzman, Director
East Side Institute for Group and Short Term Psychotherapy
920 Broadway, 14th floor
New York NY 10010
tel. 212.941.8906 ext. 324
fax 212.941.0511
lholzman@eastsideinstitute.org
www.eastsideinstitute.org
www.performingtheworld.org
loisholzman.org
On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:00 PM, michael wrote:
> Dear Ulvi and All (interested in ZPD),
>
>
>
> While I agree that Chaiklin is "dead on in his analysis on
> [Vygotsky's]
> ZPD," his analysis, in my humble opinion, is NOT "ALIVE" either.
> There is a
> clear discrepancy in Chaiklin's (2003) interpretation of the ZPD.
> While he
> asserts that "the main features of the analysis of zone of proximal
> development [concern the] whole child" (p. 50), his account of the
> whole
> child does not include explicit consideration of emotion. Yet, for
> Vygotsky,
> affect is the beginning and the end of the child's entire
> psychological
> development. Quoting Pistrak (reference unknown), Vygotsky (2004)
> stated
> that "The convictions that we may inculcate in school through
> knowledge,
> only grow roots in the child's psyche when these convictions are
> reinforced
> emotionally" (p. 55). Surely, when dealing with the development of
> the
> whole child, it is of paramount importance (according to Vygotsky)
> not to
> separate intellectual from emotional features of the child's
> development.
>
>
>
> Michael G. Levykh, Ph.D.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-
> bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
> Behalf Of ulvi icil
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 12:13 PM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: Re: [xmca] zpd
>
>
>
>
>
> Many thanks
>
>
>
> On 29/05/2009, ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org <ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org> wrote:
>
>>
>
>> Ulvi:
>
>>
>
>> here is a link to a comprehesive analysis of this concept:
>
>>
>
>> http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/ZOPEDS/Chailklin.pdf
>
>>
>
>> Seth Chaiklin I believe is dead on in his analysis.
>
>>
>
>> eric
>
>> _______________________________________________
>
>> xmca mailing list
>
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> xmca mailing list
>
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca