Hi Michael
I would also be interested. Thanks
Carol Macdonald
On 5/19/06, Mary van der Riet <VanDerRiet@ukzn.ac.za> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael
> I would be interested in the article. Thanks
> Mary
>
>
>
> Mary van der Riet; School of Psychology; University of KwaZulu-Natal
> Private Bag X01, Scottsville, 3209
>
> email: vanderriet@ukzn.ac.za
> tel: 033 260 6163; fax: 033 2605809
>
>
> >>> mroth@uvic.ca 2006/05/15 07:03 PM >>>
> Hi all,
> if anyone is interested in the question of CoP and CHAT, my colleague
>
> and former grad student Yew Jin LEE and I have an article coming out
> in a new review journal published by the European Association for
> Research on Learning and Instruction. Those interested let me know
> and I can make available (for personal use following copyright) the
> galley version of this article re-theorizing CoP and C of Learners
> from a dialectical perspective.
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
>
> On 15-May-06, at 8:54 AM, Tony Whitson wrote:
>
> Interesting idea, Don.
>
> While we're at this, I'm wondering about Legitimate Peripheral
> Participation (LPP) in Communities of Practice (CoP) as a related
> framework (i.e., Lave, Wenger, et al.).
>
> CoP theory seems more immediately obvious as a framework for design
> for doctoral preparation; but CoP & CHAT seem compatable,
> overlapping, etc. but not identical. Don, your suggestion could
> provide a concrete focus for exploring the relationships between
> these frameworks.
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2006, Cunningham, Donald James wrote:
>
> > I have been interested in the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate
> > (there is a recent article about it in the Educational Researcher -
> > http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Publications/Journals/
> > Educational_Rese
> > archer/3503/3592-03_Shulman_RN_C.pdf). It occurred to me that in our
> > quest to identify good existing examples of zopeds, an alternative
> > strategy might be to design one. Often it is easier to understand
> > something you have created than something you are looking at from
> the
> > outside. What would a doctoral program built along the principles of
> > CHAT look like? For example, would there be "leading activities"
> > and/or
> > "social situations of development" and/or
> > "meaning-formation-activities". If so, what are some examples? Would
> > using Engestrom's triangles assist us in designing or revising a
> > doctoral program? In what way would the essence of a zoped be
> > embodied?
> > Maybe some of you already know of such programs and could tell us
> > about
> > them.
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone interested in exploring this?
> >
> >
> >
> > Don Cunningham
> >
> > Indiana University
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >
>
> Tony Whitson
> UD School of Education
> NEWARK DE 19716
>
> twhitson@udel.edu
> _______________________________
>
> "those who fail to reread
> are obliged to read the same story everywhere"
> -- Roland Barthes, S/Z (1970)
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please find our disclaimer at http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> <<<<gwavasig>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 02 2006 - 08:02:43 PDT