RE: Motives and goals

From: Eugene Matusov (ematusov@UDel.Edu)
Date: Thu Feb 12 2004 - 11:30:34 PST


Dear Mike-

 

Unfortunately, reposting won't help - you have to reconstruct the link
manually as I did. But feel free to try (see below). Let me also embed the
link - it may work for some people: Engaged
<http://lpsl.coe.uga.edu/people/hickey/Publications/Engaged%20Participation%
20(DH).pdf> Participation.

 

Eugene

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Mike Cole [mailto:mcole@weber.ucsd.edu]

> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:05 PM

> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu

> Subject: RE: Motives and goals

>

> Eugene-- Could you repost the url. It runs across lines I cannot fully
copy

> and perhaps others have the same problem. Thanks for the tip.

> mike

 

Dear xmca-ers-

 

I highly recommend reading article by Dan Hickey about his very successful
(in my view) attempt to develop a sociocultural notion of motivation (see
the link below).

 

Eugene

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Dan Hickey [mailto:dhickey@coe.uga.edu]

> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 2:48 PM

> To: ematusov@UDel.Edu

> Cc: 'Steve Zuiker'

> Subject: FW: Motives and goals

>

> Eugene--

 

>

> My student Steve Zuiker forwarded this and several other posts to me.

> I am swamped with deadlines, but I thought that given you are putting

> a course together on motivation, and the reference to my 97 paper, I

> would send along something more recent.

>

> The critique of the 97 paper on the list was appropriate. That paper

> was actually written in 94. I have been working hard to move my

> motivation work forward in a direction that is would hope you would

> find more consistent with yours.

>

> I just published a paper in Elementary School Journal that you might

> find interesting. You can access it electronically at:

>

http://lpsl.coe.uga.edu/people/hickey/Publications/Engaged%20Participation%2
0(DH).pdf

>

>

> I struggle mightily because I am trying to present these ideas in a

> way that appeals to the broader community of research methodologists

> and motivation theorists. Of course, I would love to hear your feedback.

> This paper was written in 2001, and I still have a long ways to go.

> If you find it interesting I have a couple more articles that extend

> and apply this analysis in press.

>

> Dan Hickey



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 01:00:08 PST