I have not being dedicated to the systematic study of Engeström's approach
to activity (activity theory as work-ATW?).
I do not see Leontiev's AT or Engeström's ATW as things that should be
separated from or put out of Vygotsky's original theoretical-methodologic
My current understanding is that CHAT would be considered as a broader field
in which Vygotsky's cultural-historical theory of human development,
Leontiev's AT, Engeströms' ATW live side by side in a confortable way.
Am I wrong?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 01:00:07 PST