Re: The Best American Science Writing 2003

From: David Preiss (david.preiss@yale.edu)
Date: Sun Sep 28 2003 - 17:20:16 PDT


Hi Peter,

This is a topic that interests me. (I am doing research on writing). Could
you tell us what stroke your eye in the excerpt you sent us?

David

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Smagorinsky" <smago@coe.uga.edu>
To: <xmca@ucsd.edu>
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 10:45 PM
Subject: The Best American Science Writing 2003

> from today's newspaper:
>
> > The Best American Science Writing 2003. Edited by Oliver Sacks (Ecco
> Press, $27.50 hardback, $13.95 paperback). The best science writing "has a
> swiftness and naturalness, a transparency and clarity, not clogged with
> pretentiousness or literary artifice," says Sacks, a neurologist and the
> author of "Uncle Tungsten," "Awakenings" and other books. This wonderfully
> eclectic anthology includes engaging explorations into subjects ranging
> from botany to physics, cognition to evolutionary biology --- from Brendan
> Koemer's discussion of how drug companies market new diseases to Susan
> Milius' investigation into the colors of autumn leaves.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 01:00:08 PDT