peter
i would vbery much appreciate if you could send the articles to me as pdf
thanks in advance
merja
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Merja Helle
Researcher
Center for Activity Theory
Box 47
00140 University of Helsinki
Finland
e-mail:merja.helle@helsinki.fi
phone 358-(0)50-4485 111
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
You'll never know the facts before you know the fiction"
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Smagorinsky [mailto:smago@coe.uga.edu]
> Sent: 15. kesakuuta 2003 17:24
> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> Subject: Re: Why does Smagorinski not use Object?
>
>
> fyi I've got these papers and related ones as pdf files--will be happy to
> send to anyone who requests them, off-list please. Peter
> At 09:55 PM 6/14/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >Grossman, Smagorinski, et al. and has a nice article that
> differentiates
> >between *activity setting* and *arena* (in contrast to *activity system*)
> >addressing some of the problems of intersubjectivity and shared
> >motive/object. The paper appears as follows:
> >
> >Grossman, P. L., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999).
> Appropriating tools
> >for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to
> >teach. American Journal of Education, 108, 1-29.
> >
> >Cook, Smagorinsky et al. then build upon this to think about a teacher
> >making
> >the transition from a school of education to a real classroom in The
> >Elementary School Journal, which is available in the ebsco sociological
> >collection full text database. Shiploads of grounded discussion here.
> >
> >(thanks, Peter!)
> >
> >bb
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 08 2003 - 11:29:44 PDT