Re: cross-categorical comparisons

From: Phillip White (Phillip_White@ceo.cudenver.edu)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 08:24:23 PST


xmca@weber.ucsd.edu writes:

Eric wrote:
>
>
>Thank you for pointing out recent research in this area. How wonderful it
>would be if Rene Van der Veer could join XMCA for a discussion on the
>"functional method of double stimulation". One of the question marks I
>have regarding the method is whether subjects view at as a problem
>solving task and instead of measuring cross-categorical it may merely be
>a method of assessing individual 'meaning-maiking' genesis.

well, in the spirit of VVV, i suggest that you go ahead and work out your
own research and construct your own vision. teachers are always active
researchers, though reluctant to provide documentation. issues of time
and identity, i think.

phillip
 
   
* * * * * * * *
* *

The English noun "identity" comes, ultimately, from the
Latin adverb "identidem", which means "repeatedly."
The Latin has exactly the same rhythm as the English,
buh-BUM-buh-BUM - a simple iamb, repeated; and
"identidem" is, in fact, nothing more than a
reduplication of the word "idem", "the same":
"idem(et)idem". "Same(and) same". The same,
repeated. It is a word that does exactly what
it means.

                          from "The Elusive Embrace" by Daniel
Mendelsohn.

phillip white
university of colorado at denver
denver, colorado
phillip_white@ceo.cudenver.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 01 2002 - 01:00:08 PST