Re: object/boundary object

From: Phillip White (Phillip_White@ceo.cudenver.edu)
Date: Sun Jul 07 2002 - 18:59:39 PDT


Vera concluded with a quote from Luria:

There is no hope of finding the sources of free action in the lofty
realms of the mind or in the depths of the brain. The idealist approach
of the phenomenologists is as hopeless as the positive approach of the
naturalists. To discover the sources of free action it is necessary to
go outside the limits of the organism, not into the intimate sphere of
the mind, but into the objective forms of social life; it is necessary
to seek the sources of human consciousness and freedom in the social
history of humanity. To find the soul it is necessary to lose it.
A.R. Luria

 and i wonder what research evidence Luria has to support such claims?

phillip
   
* * * * * * * *
* *

The English noun "identity" comes, ultimately, from the
Latin adverb "identidem", which means "repeatedly."
The Latin has exactly the same rhythm as the English,
buh-BUM-buh-BUM - a simple iamb, repeated; and
"identidem" is, in fact, nothing more than a
reduplication of the word "idem", "the same":
"idem(et)idem". "Same(and) same". The same,
repeated. It is a word that does exactly what
it means.

                          from "The Elusive Embrace" by Daniel
Mendelsohn.

phillip white
university of colorado at denver
denver, colorado
phillip_white@ceo.cudenver.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 01:00:10 PDT