fodor=meno

From: Mike Cole (mcole@weber.ucsd.edu)
Date: Wed May 01 2002 - 14:22:18 PDT

Next message: Keith Sawyer: "Re: Rogoff?"
Previous message: Mike Cole: "Rogoff?"
Next in thread: Bill Barowy: "Re: fodor=meno"
Reply: Bill Barowy: "Re: fodor=meno"
Maybe reply: Mike Cole: "Re: fodor=meno"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

There are a number of discussions of Fodor's position, pro and con, including
by Bereiter, Newman,Griffin, & Cole, and even in MCA by Yair Newman. While
under attack, the counterarguments have yet, so far as I know, yielded
agreement on a comprehensive answer.
mike

Next message: Keith Sawyer: "Re: Rogoff?"
Previous message: Mike Cole: "Rogoff?"
Next in thread: Bill Barowy: "Re: fodor=meno"
Reply: Bill Barowy: "Re: fodor=meno"
Maybe reply: Mike Cole: "Re: fodor=meno"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 27 2002 - 08:02:49 PDT