1943 Hiring Policy for Women

From: MnFamilyMan@aol.com
Date: Mon Aug 13 2001 - 19:53:28 PDT


In a message dated 8/13/2001 8:53:50 AM Central Daylight Time,
BettyCrocker1231 writes:

> The following is an excerpt from the July 1943 issue of
> Transportation Magazine. This was serious and written for male
> supervisors of women in the work force during World War II - a mere 57
> years
> ago! Obviously, the intent was not to be "funny," but by today's
> standards, this is hilarious! For those of you with efficiency issues,
> pay attention to #8.
> >
> >  Eleven Tips on Getting More Efficiency Out of Women Employees:
> >
> > There's no longer any question whether transit companies should hire
> > women for jobs formerly held by men. The draft and manpower shortage
> has settled that point. The important things now are to select the most
> > efficient women available and how to use them to the best advantage.
> Here are eleven helpful tips on the subject from Western Properties:
> >
> > 1. Pick young married women. They usually have more of! a sense of
> > responsibility than their unmarried sisters, they're less likely
> > to be flirtatious, they need the work or they wouldn't be doing
> > it, they still have the pep and interest to work hard and to deal with
> the public efficiently.
> >
> > 2. When you have to use older women, try to get ones who have worked
> outside the home at some time in their lives. Older women who have never
> contacted the public have a hard time adapting themselves and are
> inclined to be cantankerous and fussy. It's always well to impress upon
> older
> women the importance of friendliness and courtesy.
> >
> > 3. General experience indicates that "husky" girls - those who are
> just a little on the heavy side - are more even tempered and efficient
> > than their underweight sisters.
> >
> > 4. Retain a physician to give each woman you hire a special physical
> > examination - one covering female conditions. This step not only
> protects the property against the possibilities of lawsuit, but reveals
> whether the employee-to-be has any female weaknesses which would make
> her mentally or physically unfit for the job.
>
> > 5. Stress at the outset the importance of time; the fact that a minute
> or two lost here and there makes serious inroads on schedules.Until this
> point is gotten across, service is likely to be slowed up.
> >
> > 6. Give the female employee a definite day-long schedule of duties so
> > that they'll keep busy without bothering the management for
> > instructions every few minutes. Numerous properties say that women
> make excellent workers when they have their jobs cut out for them,
> > but that they lack initiative in finding work themselves.
> >
> > 7. Whenever possible, let the inside employee change from one job to
> another at some time during the day. Women are inclined to be less
> nervous and happier with change.
> >
> > 8. Give every girl an adequate number of rest periods during the day.
> You have to make some allowances for feminine psychology. A girl
> > is more confident and is more efficient if she can keep her hair
> > tidied, apply fresh lipstick and wash her hands several times a day.
> >
> > 9. Be tactful when issuing instructions or in making criticisms. Women
> > are often sensitive; they can't shrug off harsh words the way
> > men do.  Never ridicule a woman - it breaks her spirit and cuts off
> her efficiency.
> >
> > 10. Be reasonably considerate about using strong language around
> women.  Even though a girl's husband or father may swear vociferously,
> > she'll grow to dislike a place of business where she hears too much of
> this.
> >
> > > 11. Get enough size variety in operator's uniforms so that each girl
> can have a proper fit. This point can't be stressed too much in keeping
> women happy.
>
>

At first glance one might think this an absolute joke!  Then if one were to
try and immerse themselves in the culture of the time one might actually
understnad the prespective of these 'suggestions'.  Now, the question becomes
what cultural 'suggestions' are we currently endorsing that will be viewed as
a joke 50 years from now.

Eric



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 01 2001 - 01:02:08 PDT