Re: Back a bit to Bowles and Gintis

From: MnFamilyMan@aol.com
Date: Wed Jul 11 2001 - 08:30:00 PDT


In a message dated 7/9/2001 8:55:24 AM Central Daylight Time,
mowen@rem.bangor.ac.uk writes:

> . Is a view of phylogenetic development that is based on
>

It would appear to me that our current view is more a response to the
concrete aspect of scientific thought. Abstract thought is so individualized
it is impossible for a large group of people to agree on the representation
of of its concepts. Whether we like it or not there is a biological aspect
to any theory that explains psychological processes; ontogenetically or
phylogentically linked.

With regards,
Eric



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 01 2001 - 01:01:02 PDT