Re: re: refusal and resistance

From: Judith Diamondstone (diamonju@rci.rutgers.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 27 2001 - 07:39:44 PDT


Well this discussion has taken an interesting semiotic twist.

At 06:21 AM 6/27/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Are you saying that, even though phil and dianes claim agreement, "taken as
>shared" is problematic, or are you posing particular "ideal-internal"(1)
>processes for unpacking what is not appropration?

unpacking what is not appropriation?
Naww. Taken as shared is fine w/ me. It was meant in humour; a bit skewed,
I see. I retract it. Assuming that's agreeable,

Judy



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 01 2001 - 01:01:43 PDT