>Nevertheless, the point about activity theory accounting for *surprises*,
>not necessarily how they are taken up, or ignored and buried as
>contradictions, but how the surprises and accidents emerge in the first
>place, is a good question. Where in a tension are the seeds for innovation?
perhaps in the take-up, which is where improvisation occurs
the surprises are 'there' for the attentive....
Judy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 01 2001 - 01:01:13 PDT