Re: dramatism/chat

From: Nate Schmolze (vygotsky@home.com)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:31:11 PST


And if only I read a little farther and closer - it is of course in the
1988 newsletter.

Nate

At 09:48 AM 1/29/01 -0200, you wrote:
>Gonna try to find them and read them (yours and Yrjo's).
>I'm very interestsed on them.
>
>-----Mensagem original-----
>De: Mike Cole <mcole@weber.ucsd.edu>
>Para: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
>Data: Domingo, 28 de Janeiro de 2001 23:52
>Assunto: dramatism/chat
>
>
> >
> >Ricardo-- I am re-posting a note that Yrjo posted about xmca about his
> >article concerning Stanislavsky. I might note that this article was first
> >prepared as part of a symposium we held, together with American and
> >Japanese colleagues, on the role of different art forms in theorizing
> >human nature.
> >
> >If Yrjo's book is not available, the article is at lchc.ucsd.edu in the
> >archive section, i believe.
> >mike
> >-----
> >Judith, just a quick note on Stanislavsky. The Meyerhold anecdote implies
> >one side of Stansilavsky's work and thought - the side most widely adopted
> >in the US. The other side is that Stanislavsky built his theory on the
> >foundation of external physical actions (exactly what Meyerhold suggest in
> >the anecdote). I've written a bit about this in a paper titled 'Theater as
>a
> >model system for learning to create', it appeared in 1988 in the Quarterly
> >Newsletter of the LCHC (Vol. 10, p. 54-67), also as chapter 11 in my book
> >'Learning, Working and Imagining' (1990).
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 14:24:56 PST