Re: dramatism/chat

From: Ricardo Ottoni Vaz Japiassu (rjapias@uol.com.br)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 03:48:26 PST


Gonna try to find them and read them (yours and Yrjo's).
I'm very interestsed on them.

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Mike Cole <mcole@weber.ucsd.edu>
Para: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Data: Domingo, 28 de Janeiro de 2001 23:52
Assunto: dramatism/chat

>
>Ricardo-- I am re-posting a note that Yrjo posted about xmca about his
>article concerning Stanislavsky. I might note that this article was first
>prepared as part of a symposium we held, together with American and
>Japanese colleagues, on the role of different art forms in theorizing
>human nature.
>
>If Yrjo's book is not available, the article is at lchc.ucsd.edu in the
>archive section, i believe.
>mike
>-----
>Judith, just a quick note on Stanislavsky. The Meyerhold anecdote implies
>one side of Stansilavsky's work and thought - the side most widely adopted
>in the US. The other side is that Stanislavsky built his theory on the
>foundation of external physical actions (exactly what Meyerhold suggest in
>the anecdote). I've written a bit about this in a paper titled 'Theater as
a
>model system for learning to create', it appeared in 1988 in the Quarterly
>Newsletter of the LCHC (Vol. 10, p. 54-67), also as chapter 11 in my book
>'Learning, Working and Imagining' (1990).
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 14:24:56 PST