this all brings us back to the basic question: what self are you referring
to, an innate, transcendental, substantial self? a biologically encoded
self, eg, innate sexual predisposition, an unconscious self? what is your
definition of self such that it can possess this attribute you call
"freedom" and how exactly is that self accountable to itself? sounds like a
merry go round to me.
what others? who exists as an other for you? obviously there are multiple
others, some significant, others not?
what about the others who are so other that you don't even know they exist?
are you responsible to them if you don't know they exist?
Paul H. Dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: Diane Hodges <dhodges@ceo.cudenver.edu>
To: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 4:43 PM
Subject: Re(2): freedom & responsibility (2)
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu writes:
> >who are you saying one is responsible to?
>
> i know this is for judy,
> but because i, too, am writing about this, i can say the responsibility is
> towards yourself
> and to others.
> because there is little to differentiate between yourself and others,
> the responsibility works both ways.
> diane
> **********************************************************************
> :point where everything listens.
> and i slow down, learning how to
> enter - implicate and unspoken (still) heart-of-the-world.
>
> (Daphne Marlatt, "Coming to you")
> ***********************************************************************
>
> diane celia hodges
>
> university of british columbia, centre for the study of curriculum and
> instruction
> ==================== ==================== =======================
> university of colorado, denver, school of education
>
> Diane_Hodges@ceo.cudenver.edu
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 01:00:50 PDT