Indeed it does.
I do think the xmca is more than usually conducive to such overlaps
though I shouldn't swear on it... the case may be that the e-medium forces
listsubscribers in general to "go meta" about the technicalities of the
channel and their effects.
Eva
At 20.53 -0700 0-06-25, Paul H. Dillon scrobe:
>Eva,
>
>This little example of autoregulation, ie Bill's statement concerning the
>existence of the worm and provision of the sites for its remedy (which I
>used immediately) provides an interesting example of an overlap between the
>first and the third level of your interlinked activity system model for
>xmca.
>
>Paul H. Dillon
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Eva Ekeblad <eva.ekeblad@goteborg.utfors.se>
>To: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
>Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2000 4:34 AM
>Subject: Re: worms
>
>
>Being on a Mac, using Eudora, I can report this:
>
>There have been two xmca postings carrying some very interesting garbage at
>the end -- it looks like the code for the worm un-dish-covered.
>
>The first one was Michael Erickson's *Bagels and Ontology*, sent at Fri, 23
>Jun 2000 17:37:46 -0400 and the second one Paul Dillon's reply to same at
>Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:44:40 -0700 -- after that y'all seem to be clean.
>
>Get well!
>Eva
>
>
>At 17.56 -0700 0-06-24, Paul H. Dillon scrobe:
>>Judy,
>>
>>I don't think you got it from me, I received a message saying my response
>to
>>Michael E's message had been cleaned up before being posted to xmca. If
>>this is the case, however, how did Michael's get past the virus software>?>
>>
>>Paul H. Dillon
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 01 2000 - 01:00:42 PDT