beeeeutifully said, Genevieve

Mike Cole (mcole who-is-at weber.ucsd.edu)
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 20:11:28 -0700 (PDT)

Hi All-- I have been following fleetingly, but am swamped with quarter
beginning

Genevieve wrote:

Essentially, the department had carved out
a kind of 'instructional space' for developmental
students that broke with the rigid 'Step A goes to
Semester 1, Step B goes to Semester 2 and if you can't
follow you fail' flow of student bodies in the writing
curriculum. Basically, this was a form of retention.
Then, about 3 or 4 semesters into the experience, the
Chancellor's Office told us to shape up and cut out
all the parallel courses. We were being very bad boys
& girls for keeping qualified students back, and a
student who passes a particular level is by definition
qualified to tackle the next.

For a long time we at LCHC have railed againt all forms of
"Level 1 before Level 2" stage theories of literacy and
numeracy acquition. They are built for domination and conservatism.
They select in a deadly way.

My colleagues and I have written about this pernicious form of
pedagogy/selction in a number of places. Getting this message
straight would be, in my opinion, very helpful. But maybe its
crooked by nature?

This discussion is getting close to what I consder the heart of the
matter: the essential duality of formal education FROM THE BEGINNING:
its entwinement with (literally) middle class and its double message"
transform AND select. Teachers live at the contradictory heart of that
matter.

Can we make it beyond chaining?
mike