------=_NextPart_000_0025_01BEB593.0262C540
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"If the "mentally ill" cannot or will not respond to, or even seek out, =
help from neurology's chemicalia, then _they'll_ be responsible. It'll =
be their own fault, their own problem, and they'll have to take the =
blame. Eventually, this must manifest itself in the most inhumane =
decisions for those who cannot cope with life. I seem to recall that =
Clinton took time off from his first presidential hustings to expedite =
the execution of a mentally disabled person in Arkansas."
I think it goes beyond individual to social responsibility, but then =
that usually amounts to the same thing. A child who can't sit still is =
in need of some sort of chemical assistance. If a parent objects they =
are seen as suspect, even to the extent of being abusive for not =
agreeing to such chemical enhancement. I found the Learning Mystique by =
Coles as an interesting historical tracing of the use of drugs/chemicals =
in education. Much of the "objective" knowledge which current research =
in built upon is very shaky. Many of the original studies were very =
badly done. Coles repeats many of the original research using some of =
Luria's tests.
I do however, think we need to be mutually concerned with determinism on =
the other end. So often in the medical/health literature an effect from =
multiple causes become a determiner of a particular cause. For =
example, an abused child may be angry, shy, etc, but this does not imply =
if I run into a shy or angry child they have been abused. I see both =
social/biological determinism as having more in common than different. =
In education they seem to be very compatible with each other. A child =
not conforming or fitting the particular mold (active or passive) is =
explained either through social or biological determinism. It is either =
that awful environment does not permit him to learn (conform) or the =
child needs certain chemicals so he can concentrate on the particular =
tasks.
It doesn't seem to matter if the determinism, to go back to the frogs, =
is because of the environment (wrong kind of bucket) or biology or =
genetics (frogs need some Ritalin), in the end it is our desire to have =
simple solutions for complicated processes.=20
Nate
------=_NextPart_000_0025_01BEB593.0262C540
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">