Re: Robotized competitive grading

Angel Lin (ENANGEL who-is-at cityu.edu.hk)
Wed, 23 Dec 1998 17:50:24 +0800

Jay, your 3-level model sounds very interesting though a bit abstract to
grasp. Could you give an example (real or imaginary) to illustrate how
individual actions, institutional change, and societal change are related?
For instance, how do individual actions can possibly lead to institutional
change and institutional change to societal change. Yes, I've been reading
Faircough's Discourse and Social Change and he seems to be talking about
something on a similar line, but your model seems a lot more complicated
and intriguing. Could you elaborate/illustrate your model in a bit more
concrete detail? Thanks a lot.
Angel L.

>
>A rather sloppy and perhaps inaccurate application of my current
>multiple-scales model of social systems would suggest that while our
>individual acts can't do much to influence the society-wide scale
>formations directly, they can influence the institutional-level formations,
>within the latitude available from the constraints at the higher, more
>slowly-changing social scales. We could move to affirm Quality and
>Standards in our schools and universities at the same time we opt out of
>the Great Sorting. If we did, other institutions would tend to take over
>the Sorting, but society would change, in some unpredictable ways, and
>schools and universities would change in at least some, more predictable,
>positive ways. HOW we could opt out, or at least significantly reduce our
>institutional coupling into the Sorting, is a solvable problem of strategy.
>It requires looking at the relevant economics, politics, and ideologies
>from the individual scale (us and our colleagues, students) to the
>institutional scale (governance forms, budget dependencies) to the
>trans-institutional scale (resource inputs and trade-offs, political
>authorities). It's a classic political problem: how to mobilize resources
>from the lowest level to reorganize the intermediate level in ways that are
>permitted by the constraints from the higher level, resulting over time in
>change in all three levels. Just as this kind of social change cannot be
>accomplished by the isolated actions of individuals, so it also cannot be
>prevented by general social structures. It is similar in logic to Mike
>Cole's mesogenetic strategies, but easier insofar as it does not require
>the creation of entirely new institutional forms. It is also, contrary to
>general belief, not necessarily incremental or reformist: it can have
>radical, revolutionary, large-scale (and small-scale) consequences -- they
>just don't happen to be predictable.
>
>JAY.
>---------------------------
>JAY L. LEMKE
>PROFESSOR OF EDUCATION
>CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
>JLLBC who-is-at CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
><http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/index.htm>
>---------------------------
>
>